AIDS scare reducing basic health funds: critics
By Ranjit Devraj
NEW DELHI - A new UN report showing over 300,000 AIDS-related deaths in
India last year, has revived charges that Western donors are neglecting
bigger public health problems in the country.
The Indian government's World Bank-funded National AIDS Control
Organization has questioned the findings of the UNaids' (the joint UN
Program on HIV/AIDS) ''Report on the global HIV/AIDS epidemic - June
2000.''
The Indian AIDS control body, better known by its acronym Naco, has again
protested at what it claims are highly exaggerated AIDS statistics on
India. ''There is no basis for these projections and the UNaids
headquarters in Geneva could not explain how they reached these
estimates,'' said Naco Director Prasada Rao. According to Naco, which
works under the Ministry of Health, the number of AIDS-related deaths in
1999 was 11,000.
Meanwhile, some are worried that such figures will lead to even more
spending on AIDS/HIV control in India at the cost of more pressing public
health problems.
This is not the first time Naco has disputed UNaids figures on India. Six
years ago, Naco officially questioned the basis on which UNaids calculated
that India then had 1.75 million people infected with the AIDS virus. The
latest UNaids estimate puts the number of those infected with HIV at 3.7
million. However, UNaids admits that India's epidemic is highly diverse.
''While some states show almost no HIV infection, others have reached
adult HIV prevalence rates of 2 percent and above,'' says the latest
report. An official at the UNaids office in the Indian capital said the
latest statistics were ''projections based on our knowledge of how long it
takes for HIV to spread in a given population''.
But critics say these figures are as unreliable as Naco's which are not
based on an actual body count or proper certification of the cause of
death. They point to the absence of hard supporting evidence and any
baseline data that can be used to make reliable projections. Naco uses
blood samples picked up at blood donation camps and ante-natal clinics
which are then tested for HIV. The results form the basis of the estimate
of HIV spread in the country. But some experts say the method is highly
unreliable.
When UNaids chief Peter Piot was in India in March, he was asked why the
HIV/AIDS spread in India was not as large as projected by his
organization. Despite a more than 30 percent incidence of sexually
transmitted diseases (STDs) in the country due to unsafe sex, there is no
corresponding HIV incidence. According to Piot, India could be on the
threshold of an AIDS/HIV epidemic and could soon see an Uganda-like
situation of sudden spread.
However, some health experts question the large government and donor
spending on what to them is a non-existent disease in a country with
serious public health problems caused by germs that were wiped out long
ago in other parts of the world. According to noted economist Jeffrey
Sachs, who was in India in April as chair of the Commission on
Macroeconomics and Health set up by the World Health Organization (WHO),
India is heavily burdened by vector and water-borne diseases and
respiratory illnesses such as tuberculosis. Sachs said India's economic
reforms, begun in 1991, led to successive cuts in the federal health
budget which almost crippled the public health delivery system. In sharp
contrast, funding for HIV/AIDS control has grown. Tuberculosis control got
$18 million last year against $55 million for HIV/AIDS. India is estimated
to have one-fourths of the world's tuberculosis cases.
''People are beginning wonder why AIDS seminars are being conducted in the
middle of a malaria outbreak in (the northeastern border state of) Assam
or during famine-like conditions in (western) Rajasthan (state),'' said
Mira Shiva of the Voluntary Health Association of India (VHAI).
Three years ago, a report of the Independent Commission for Health in
India consisting of well known public health experts, warned that
''excessive funding (for HIV/AIDS) has clearly influenced the direction of
health policy in India.'' The report noted that external funding for
communicable diseases may not match India's public health priorities and
that the content of a program is influenced through foreign funding. Ute
Schumann, a health consultant to the European Union with several years
experience of Indian health services, used the 1999 World Health Report to
show that India now has a policy of financing disease control which is
heavily skewed in favor of HIV/AIDS.
Those who think that the AIDS/HIV program is hijacking the nation's real
health agenda, were encouraged when the powerful Prime Minister's Office
ordered a review of Naco's strategies earlier this year. The review was
ordered after a leading NGO, the Joint Action Council made presentations
to show how strategies promoted by Naco and UNaids were based on data
gathered using questionable methodology.
''There does seem to be an attempt to hype up the figures and cause an
AIDS scare (in the country),'' a senior bureaucrat in the prime minister's
office had then observed.