Corruption causing Bangladeshi poverty
By Tabibul Islam
DHAKA - When a college lecturer went to a local police station to report
his 13-year-old maid servant missing he was told by police officials that
he was himself not above suspicion.
''You know, smuggling of young girls outside the country is a lucrative
business. Many well-to-do people who look innocent are involved in this
trade,'' the police official hinted. The lecturer, who did not want to be
named, said he was initially struck dumb by the insinuation but realized
very quickly what the officer was after - gratification.
''Police in Bangladesh know every dirty trick to extort money from both
criminals and innocent people alike,'' said a retired public servant.
With a reputation for corruption people have generally lost confidence in
the police force and prefer to keep it at a safe distance even when in
real trouble.
A recent survey by the Berlin-based, Transparency International (TI) team
reveals the extent of corruption not only among police officers but also
officialdom in other sectors such as health, education and even the
judiciary. Of 2,500 respondents interviewed by the TI team in both urban
and rural areas 68 percent said the police demanded bribes for routine
procedures like recording complaints or filing first information reports.
Upto 90 percent of the respondents said it was impossible to get police
help without money or influence.
Little wonder then that a survey conducted by a Bengali language daily
showed more than a hundred police officials in Dhaka city owning
properties worth more than $60 million.
The large imposing mansions in the posh areas of Dhaka are invariably
owned by political leaders, police officers and members of the civil and
military bueaucracy. According to a World Bank report the income of police
officials is assuming huge proportions as a result of widespread extortion
and bribery.
Things have come to such a pass that nothing moves in the public sector
without bribery - or speed money as the bank calls it - changing hands.
So pervasive has corruption become that its size and scope is the subject
or ordinary conversation within professional groups, the diplomatic
community and business.
Despite high-sounding pledges by government leaders, starting with the
prime minister, to wipe out corruption it is eating into the vitals of the
nation unchecked and studies here and abroad list Bangladesh as one of the
most corrupt countries in the world.
Reports by the bank, TI, and the UNDP speak of billions of dollars
changing hands every year as bribery, kickbacks, deals, favouritism,
cronyism and nepotism.
Terming corruption in a poor country like Bangladesh as ''unaffordable and
unacceptable'', a 1999 UNDP report came down heavily on political parties
and their leadership, student bodies, trade unions, bureaucracy, police,
judiciary and business segments.
The World Bank report blamed both the ruling and the mainstream opposition
parties for using their powerful trade unions, student and youth fronts
for resorting to widespread extortion in return for official largesse and
other benefits.
Politicians corrupt the administration through creation, infiltration and
patronization of cadres and the police maintain chain and linkages with
the politicos, observed the 1999 US human rights report for Bangladesh.
Corruption became institutionalized during the 9-year one-man rule of
desposed president H M Ershad who used it to perpetuate his regime. Ershad
encouraged rent-seeking practices, bribery, corruption and favouritism.
During his regime dishonest industrialists and business men were doled out
bank loans without security and a culture of loan default began to catch
on. By the time he was eased out of power towards the end of 1990, the
size of defaulted loans stood at $2 billion. When the Bangladesh National
Party (BNP) came to power in 1991 as many as 21 cases were framed against
Ershad - of which 19 were related to corruption.
The former military ruler was sentenced to 13 years imprisonment
corruption and spent five years in jail - the entire period of the past
BNP government. But after the 1996 general elections both the BNP and the
Awami League sought Ershad's help in the formation of the government and
he finally tilted towards the Awami League and came out of jail.
Many observers accuse donor countries and agencies of patronizing
corruption. A task force headed by Grameen Bank claimed in 1991 that
hardly 25 percent of the people of Bangladesh benefitted from aid. Cronies
and consultants of the donor agencies in league with local contractors,
politicians and officials eating up a lion's of foreign loans, aid and
grants, experts say.
Moyeen Khan, member of parliament and minister for planning in the past
BNP government, said despite pumping in huge loans and grants at the rate
of nearly $2 billion every year since 1974, half of Bangladesh continues
mired in poverty.
Corruption makes the rich richer and the poor poorer as latter lack the
funds to bribe or pay for the private provision of services that are
supposed to be provided free as public services,'' says Bank country
director Frederick Temple.
According to the US ambassador to Bangladesh John C Holzman, the
rent-seeking behavior of police and government officials and political
violence were raising business costs directly and making Bangladesh less
competitive in a world economy.
''Because of corruption, money is going to people who are not
entrepreneurs and this huge amount of money is being spent in unproductive
sectors,'' said A W Mintoo, president of the federation of Bangladesh
Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
Temple recommends three basic remedies - raising of public service
salaries for senior officials, financing of political parties and
elections and restricting the scope of the public sector to appropriate
roles by encouraging privatization.
According to the UNDP report curbing corruption would result in raising
the GDP growth rate by 2.9 percent and result in a 25 percent reduction
poverty and a doubling of per capita income from $350 to $700.
Says finance minister Shah Kibria, ''we will have to devise policy
instruments and create strong public opinion against the cancer of
corruption.''
Kibria said the tragedy was that many people who were vocal against
corruption were often among those who indulged in it themselves.