Think tank counts costs of Sri Lankan civil war
By Feizal Samath
COLOMBO - A 17-year-old separatist campaign by Tamil militants and
military operations against them have cost Sri Lanka nearly two years
worth of its annual gross domestic product estimates a leading think tank.
''It is reasonable to conclude that, under even the most conservative
assumptions, the country has incurred a war cost amounting to two years of
annual GDP (at 1996 rates),'' the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS) said
in a report released this week.
The quasi-government agency warned in its report that the longer the
conflict runs ''the further the cost will increase, with the burden
falling most heavily on the poor and the young of this country.''
Entitled ''The Economic cost of the war in Sri Lanka,'' the Institute's
report is the most comprehensive economic assessment of the ethnic
conflict so far.
Up to 75,000 people have died in the war waged mainly in Sri Lanka's north
and east by Tamil rebels demanding a separate state in that region for the
country's minority community. The civil war, since 1983, has wreaked havoc
on the country's economy, dissuaded foreign investors and tourists and led
to thousands of Tamils fleeing to the west and seeking political asylum or
staying in refugee camps.
Last week, heavy battles broke out in the northern Jaffna peninsula after
the rebels launched a fresh offensive, to make a up for a failed effort to
capture the strategic Elephant Pass military base. Army troops were able
to resist the latest rebel advance but suffered heavy casualties in the
process, the Defense Ministry said. Up to 145 soldiers including officers
were killed while rebel casualties, were close to 100.
Civilian officials in Jaffna said more than 12,500 people living near the
Elephant Pass causeway were trapped in the fighting and negotiations were
on with Red Cross authorities for safe passage. Tamil parliamentarian
Ananda Sangari wrote to President Chandrika Kumaratunga on Saturday,
urging her to evacuate the civilians to safer ground.
The new report said estimating full costs was difficult, if not
impossible. ''The human and social costs, disability, dispossession and
psychological trauma associated with violence and terror are not really
quantifiable.''
''On the other hand, in assessing the costs of war to an economy, one
would ideally calculate the destruction of production factors to determine
the country's potential output without war and then compare this
information with the actual output,'' it said.
The report reflects a widely held view that the consequences of the ethnic
conflict have been felt in every sphere of social and economic life.
Insecurity and vulnerability is prevalent among various sections of the
population in addition to a feeling of despair and hopelessness among
youth and an erosion of political, legal and social rights.
The defense budget has been ballooning over the years. Sri Lanka,
traditionally a low defense budget country, has seen defense expenditure
rise from below half percent of GDP in the early 1970s to an estimated 6
percent of GDP in 1995. ''This increase took place at a time when average
defense expenditure in the developing countries as a whole was falling -
to 3 percent of GDP from 7.1 percent in the 1985-1995 period,'' the report
said.
This is not the first study on the economic implications of the war. Three
studies have been done previously, one commissioned by the National Peace
Council - a local peace agency - and two others by local and foreign
researchers.
But those studies, were based on limited data, ignore the concept of value
added in production and do not draw any distinction between the gross
value of lost production and its net value.
The Institute found that military spending by the government between 1984
and 1996 totalled $4.1 billion or was equivalent to 41 percent of Sri
Lanka's 1996 GDP while on a conservative estimate military spending by the
rebels would have been around 10 percent of government costs.
The cost of dry rations and food to displaced people and losses from
damage to infrastructure in war-torn areas and in Colombo, through rebel
attacks, amounted to a total of 13.5 percent of the country's 1996 GDP.
Referring to lost income since many people died during their most
productive years, the report observed that though the cost in terms of
mental agony suffered by widows, children and parents couldn't be
quantified, the ''pure economic costs of these lost lives is not minor''.
These include not only the direct loss to the economy in terms of a
reduced labor force but also because these deaths and injuries affected
the productivity of others such as the families and friends of the
victims.
''In our calculations, however, this effect has been ignored and it is
assumed that the cost to the economy from the lost lives is solely the
foregoing output due to the reduced labor force,'' the authors of the
report said.
Not included in the new study were reduced health stock - low weight,
births and mental illnesses - and the corresponding higher health costs,
general breakdown in law and order, brain drain, disruptions to the
education system and infrastructure bottlenecks created due to security
measures.