WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Southeast Asia
     Feb 27, 2010
Financial karma for Thailand's Thaksin
By Shawn W Crispin

BANGKOK - What one hand of the Thai state gave in privileged telecommunications concessions, the other has taken away on charges of policy corruption and the accumulation of unusual wealth. In a highly anticipated Supreme Court verdict on Friday, a nine-judge panel ruled to seize US$1.4 billion (46.4 billion baht) worth of former prime minister and telecom concessionaire Thaksin Shinawatra's and his family's assets.

The court found that Thaksin and his ex-wife Pojaman na Pombejra concealed their assets in violation of laws that bar politicians and their spouses from owning shares in private companies while in office. Judges also ruled that Thaksin abused his power as premier by implementing policies that directly benefited his private companies, including the now Singapore-owned Shin Corp, Advanced Info Services and Thaicom, then known as Shin Satellite.

Thaksin's defense had maintained that the charges were politicized, coming in the aftermath of the 2006 military coup that toppled his government, and he challenged the legitimacy of the military-appointed Asset Examination Committee that originally built the case against him. His lawyers also argued that there were no legal grounds to seize all of Thaksin's and his family's assets because much of the funds were earned before he took public office in February 2001.

A potential $2.3 billion (76.6 billion baht) worth of frozen assets were in question in the trial. It was not immediately clear from the decision if the Finance Ministry's revenue department would be empowered by the verdict to seize another 36 billion baht it has ordered frozen from Thaksin's two children, Panthongtae and Pinthongta. The ministry has claimed the two owe at least 12 billion baht in back taxes from the 2006 sale of Shin Corp to Singapore's Temasek.

The landmark ruling represents the biggest state seizure of a deposed Asian leader's assets since the 1986 fall of the notoriously corrupt dictator Ferdinand Marcos in the Philippines. The more complicated case against Thaksin represents the second corruption conviction against him since his government was toppled in 2006. He fled into exile in August 2008 just days before being sentenced to two years in prison for his role in an irregular Bangkok land deal involving his government and ex-wife.

The court-ordered seizure of Thaksin's assets is in line with the gathering trend towards the "judicialization" of Thai politics, an apparently royally endorsed concept where high courts and judges assume the role the monarchy has traditionally played in mediating the country's complex and often heated political disputes. Observers noted that King Bhumibol Adulyadej symbolically addressed groups of judges on two occasions in recent weeks, urging them to adjudicate with "righteousness" the cases they handle. By Thai law, the monarchy is above politics.

The widely revered monarch made a similar address in the lead-up to a Constitutional Tribune decision in May 2007 that resulted in the legal dissolution of Thaksin's former ruling Thai Rak Thai party and banned 111 of the its top executives - including Thaksin - from politics for five years. After a period of ill-health that has confined Bhumibol to hospital since last September 19, the 82-year-old monarch has resumed certain ceremonial roles in the weeks leading up to Friday's decision.

While conservative interests have looked towards the courts to play a larger role in checking and balancing politicians and officials ahead of the eventual royal succession, Thaksin's red shirt-wearing United Front for Democracy Against Dictatorship (UDD) protest group supporters have challenged the impartiality of recent verdicts that they perceive have disproportionately gone against them, including the court-ordered dissolution of two Thaksin-aligned, democratically elected political parties since 2007.

It is not immediately clear whether the landmark verdict will lead to more or less political instability. Acting government spokesman Panitan Watanayagorn predicted in an interview before the verdict that the country's political situation would improve after the ruling. He noted that Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva planned to focus less on domestic politics and more on neglected foreign policy, including planned trips to Australia, India and Russia, after the verdict.

On the other side of the political divide, the ruling will likely fuel the Thaksin-aligned UDD's rally call against what it has claimed are double standards in Thai society. UDD protest leaders retreated from earlier plans to stage mass rallies meant to pressure the government ahead of the ruling, but have now vowed to bring one million Thaksin supporters from the provinces to Bangkok in mid-March to topple Abhisit's government and force new elections.

Some analysts wonder whether the seizure of Thaksin's substantial assets will impact on the UDD's future ability to orchestrate and finance future large scale protests. Thaksin has consistently denied that he bankrolls the UDD, but the group's leaders and supporters clearly march to his orders, including his call from exile last April for his supporters to rise up in a “revolution” and overthrow Abhisit's government.

Because many here believe that future stability is dependent on Thaksin's access to funds, the level of his off-shore holdings is a matter of wild speculation in the local media. Thaksin said in a recent interview with the Times of London that he still has between $100-$200 million in assets off-shore. Diplomats tracking the situation note that he clearly has enough funds to make recent investments in lotteries in Fiji and Uganda and gold mines in Swaziland and Papua New Guinea, among other high risk ventures.

Other political analysts wonder whether the seizure of his billions and intensified efforts to extradite him from the United Arab Emirates will push the exiled former premier towards brinksmanship, including a possible expansion of the conflict from Bangkok into the northeastern rural provinces where his support is known to run strongest. They point to recent threats made by rogue retired and current military elements in Thaksin's camp who have called for the creation of a "people's army" and veiled threats to assassinate judges and officials involved in the handling of his assets case.

Underlining the emerging fragmentation of Thaksin's camp, the UDD issued a statement refuting those claims, saying it has "renounced our previous call to arms" and "categorically denies any involvement" in a recent grenade attack on army headquarters and a C-4-laden explosive found in front of the Supreme Court weeks before Friday's verdict. It's unclear which group now has the former premier's ear, but historically Thaksin has played political factions in his camp off one another in divide and rule fashion.

The government has pre-emptively responded to the threats by mobilizing joint civilian and security force teams across 38 provinces, including in Bangkok, and the erecting of new security cameras in areas of the national capital, including this week in front of the Supreme Court. To guard against a chaotic repeat of last April's breakdown in law and order, government spokesman Panitan said that security forces are prepared to deploy new "layering" techniques to prevent peaceful protests from spiraling into violent riots.

The seizure of $ 1.4 billion Thaksin's Thailand-based assets will spur new guessing games about exactly how much he may have socked away off-shore and his future willingness to funnel those funds into new bouts of instability. One government insider speculated that Thaksin's declining fortunes were already evident before Friday's verdict, witnessed in what he viewed as his "third class" private jet, decidedly "middle class" dwellings in Dubai and wardrobe shift from Armani to less refined business suits.

Others believe the image-conscious Thaksin has purposefully downgraded his on-camera presentation to evoke sympathy among his rural supporters and that he is keeping his financial powder dry to press his case for a royal pardon after the eventual succession from Bhumibol to his heir apparent son, Crown Prince Vajiralongkorn. While Thaksin is no doubt financially down with the seizure, it's not clear yet that he's politically out.

Shawn W Crispin is Asia Times Online's Southeast Asia Editor.

(Copyright 2010 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

 

 

asia dive site

Asia Dive Site
 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2010 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110