|
No
invite for Jesus to Malaysian
Christmas By Ioannis Gatsiounis
KUALA
LUMPUR
- In multi-ethnic Malaysia, where Muslims make up a
slim majority and control the government but where there
are also sizeable Christian, Hindu and Buddhist minorities,
news that the government would ban any reference
to Jesus in hymns and Christian symbols like the
nativity scene from its Christmas Day open house,
was destined to ruffle some feathers.
According to reports, the request to ban the mention
of Jesus at the public Christmas celebration at Petaling
Jaya on December 25 - held in the presence of King
Syed Sirajuddin and Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi -
was made in order to "protect Muslim sensibilities".
At first the state-neutered press
ignored the story; it generally considers race and
religion too sensitive to discuss. But with a swelling
number of postings to websites, blogs and e-mail
chat groups questioning the logic of the decision - and by way, the
substance of Malaysia's brand of "tolerance and
diversity" - it wasn't long before the mainstream media
weighed in.
"In the end," declared an editorial
in a ruling-party paper on Monday, "it turned out to be
a case of much ado about nothing." Mere "rumors", the
paper added.
Evidence points to the contrary.
But this response, along with church officials'
concurrence with it - despite the fact that the same
church leaders charged the government with usurping
Christmas in the first place - are a window into the
tendency to truncate discussion on racial and religious
differences; they provide a closer look at how this
inclination has worked to both preserve and undermine
national unity here.
Neighboring Singapore's
former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew once said he felt
relieved not to have had to govern Malaysia, with all
the challenges involved in keeping its various groups
contented. It was an indirect compliment to Malaysian
leadership; Malaysia hasn't undergone large-scale racial
violence since 1969. And it was no doubt toward
preserving this trend that government representatives,
according to church leaders close to the discussions,
requested that Jesus' name and representative symbols be
banned from the official Christmas ceremony.
The
request is nothing new. According to a church insider
speaking on the condition of anonymity, the government
has been urging similar restraints from the church for
each of the last three years. Each year the church has
acquiesced. "The difference is," he said, "this year
someone decided to speak up."
If someone had
not, it's hardly likely Arts, Culture and Heritage
Minister Dr Rais Yatim would have declared, "There is no
ban, officially or unofficially" or participated in a
soft-pitch interview that accompanied the editorial on
Monday. In it he was asked, "Will Christmas hymns be
allowed?" He replied, "Why not? ... why should we say no
to Christmas carols? Yes, some quarters have tried to
say that the government is imposing restrictions and
prohibitions. To this, I say: 'Attend the Christmas
party ... Then talk.'"
Not everyone is satisfied
with this reply. They point out that there is a
difference between hymns and carols; that the use of
Jesus' name, the central point of contention, was never
mentioned during the interview; and that saying there
was no ban obfuscates the government's intentions - a
strongly worded request by the government is as good as
a ban.
Some Christian leaders said the request
is understandable, given the nature of the event. "The
government doesn't want the celebration to turn into a
religious issue, they want to bring Malaysians together,
not to ostracize them," said Reverend Dr Herman Shastri
of the Council of Churches in Kuala Lumpur. Shastri
attended the handful of meetings between the government
and church officials in preparation for the event. "We
have agreed to use more neutral symbols like stars and
Christmas trees [instead of ones representing Jesus]. It
is a social event and not a religious event. Celebrating
the joy of being together as Malaysians is what it's
about. Religion is not primary."
Others feel
that banning Jesus from the party is more divisive than
inviting him, even if Muslims see Jesus as the
second-to-last prophet and Christians worship him as the
son of God.
"What is so sensitive about
celebrating in public the birth of Jesus?" asked a
letter writer to a local news website. "If [the
government] is sincere in joining in the festivity, it
should accept Christianity for what it is and not try to
manipulate the meaning of Christmas by banning the use
of the word 'Jesus'. This is not only an insult to
Christians but an insult to Islam as well."
Many
non-Muslims here quietly resent the ruling party's
promotion of Islam, unrestrained as they see it. Indeed
much of the architecture of a new multi-billion dollar
administrative capital is Islamic-themed. A "floating"
mosque there towers beside a lake, but churches or
Indian and Chinese temples have gone missing. At many
public functions the doa, a request to Allah, is
spoken aloud, while non-Muslims are requested to
silently make their own allegiances or requests.
Non-Muslims are ever more concerned with the
Islamic revival that took root here in the late 1970s.
The revival has gained steam in recent years, partly due
to globalization and the foreign policy of some
developed nations, which many Muslims here equate with a
war against Islam. Another factor contributing to the
revival is the struggle between the opposition
conservative Islamic party, Parti Islam Se-Malaysia
(PAS), and the ruling United Malays National
Organization (UMNO).
Each party has made a show
of its Islamic credentials to secure Muslim votes. The
concern with this development, not only among
non-Muslims, is that the parties are using Islam for
their own political gain.
In March, however, the
ruling coalition, thought to be more moderate than PAS,
won parliamentary elections decisively. And some
supporters of the Islamic revival point out that
revivalism and fundamentalism should not be equated with
intolerance and insensitivity. Indeed, the tendency here
among most Muslims has been to find a way to coexist
peacefully with non-Muslims. Thus far it has worked. But
pockets of the Islamic community have become more
assertive as the changing global landscape has made them
more sensitive to perceived slights. This can be
dangerous, said Hatta Ramli, a central committee member
of PAS.
The government needs to think a little
bit harder about the true meaning of tolerance, Ramli
said. "Why should there be restrictions for Christians
on Christmas? Let [Christians] organize [the event] how
they wish, and if [non-Christians] want to visit, it's
up to them."
Added Rashid Moten, professor of
political science at the International Islamic
University here: "The Islamic state offers freedom of
religion to others." The Malaysian constitution lists
Islam as the official religion but recognizes the right
to embrace and practice other faiths. Rights, though,
have been known to be curbed. For instance, Christians
are barred from printing and disseminating the Bible in
the national language, Bahasa Melayu.
Moten said
slighting other religions to protect Muslims could have
societal repercussions; if groups are sheltered from
being exposed to the ideas and practices of other
faiths, then they are less likely to tolerate them when,
inevitably, they do come in contact with them.
Shastri said in the era of globalization,
Muslims have ample exposure to non-Muslim practices,
from Hollywood movies to news media to fashion.
Furthermore, he said, Muslim suspicion of some Christian
practices is warranted, given the history of
proselytizing among some Christian sects here.
In the end, he said, he was happy to meet the
government's requests. "We don't want to overdo it
because [the event] will bring together people of
different cultures and religions." Besides, he added,
"there is no shortage of promotion of what Christmas is
about."
But among the mid- and lower levels of
church leadership, disquiet lingers over the
government's request. These voices say that the
government's demand is the tip of the iceberg - that the
government has been passively aggressively slighting
minority religions for some time now, and is getting
bolder. Recently, for instance, Muslims were barred from
watching the film The Passion of the Christ. Only
a handful of theaters were allowed to show the film.
The church insider mentioned above said that
while church leadership and the government regret that
the disagreement was made public and are trying hard to
put and end to the controversy, that it was exposed is a
victory for non-Muslims, and in turn for Malaysia.
In Malaysia, he said, the government deems many
of the issues dearest to the rakyat's (citizen's) hearts
- from race to religion to human rights - too sensitive
to discuss. "So no one takes the bull by horns for fear
of being accused of inciting unrest. But the more people
keep quiet, [the] more their rights are going to be
eroded."
Shastri said
he has full confidence that the Christmas day
celebration will be held in the true spirit of Malaysia.
Christmas hymns as well as Malay and Chinese songs will
be sung, he said.
If past official Christmas
ceremonies here are an indication, all caroling with
any Christian connotation will cease upon the entry of
the Muslim agong (king).
But when interviewed
on Wednesday, minister Yatim said he didn't know
if this would be the
case. "I have not seen the program. Organizers will
do what is proper for the agong to see."
Ioannis Gatsiounis, a New York native,
has worked as a freelance foreign correspondent and
previously co-hosted a weekly political/cultural radio
call-in show in the US. He has been living in Malaysia
since late 2002.
(Copyright 2004 Asia Times
Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us for
information on sales, syndication and republishing.)
|