Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Southeast Asia

Malaysia's fox takes charge of the henhouse
By Anil Netto

PENANG, Malaysia - Malaysians have been having trouble imagining the hard-driving former premier, Mahathir Mohamad, spending his retirement tending to his garden and playing with his grandchildren after 22 years in power. So when Mahathir, who stepped down at the end of October, was appointed adviser to Petronas, the national oil company, it set tongues wagging.

The deal had been in the offing for quite some time, according to Petronas chairman Azizan Zainul Abidin, who said, presumably with a straight face, that Mahathir was appointed because he had previously contributed many ideas to improving Petronas' operations.

During Mahathir's years in power, the wholly owned oil company was often used as a national piggy bank to bail out a flock of politically connected banks and other firms, the national airline Malaysia Airlines (MAS), the limping national car company Proton, and a variety of controversial projects of various and dubious utility.

Critics point out that anyone who can influence or "advise" on the way Petronas funds are used would be in a powerful position - especially when the adviser is the former boss of the new premier, Abdullah Badawi, himself relatively inexperienced in finance. In addition to the premiership, Abdullah assumed the Finance Ministry portfolio from Mahathir as well.

Set up in 1974, Petronas, or Petroliam Nasional Bhd, with total oil and gas reserves of 24 billion barrels of oil equivalent, 80 percent of it domestic, is extremely powerful. It has a presence in more than 30 countries, including some with dubious human-rights records such as Sudan and Myanmar. It is cash-rich with good assets, low debt, and a strong balance sheet.

But critics say it has not been fully transparent about how its money is spent. Its managers are answerable to the premier and its financial results are not included in the national budget.

"Petronas has neither been fully transparent nor accountable with how it spends its money, especially in aiding and abetting Tun Mahathir to indulge in unproductive construction of megaprojects, to bail out ailing crony companies and corporate figures, and to involve [itself\ in excessive and wasteful spending on celebrations and conferences," said opposition politician Syed Husin Ali.

Since the early 1980s, Petronas has never been far from controversy or criticism, especially in its involvement in high profile bailouts of the debt-ridden and political connected Bank Bumiputra, now merged into Bumiputra Commerce. For a long spell, Bank Bumiputra was kept afloat with huge injections of Petronas funds.

One of the biggest outcries came in 1998, when cash-rich Petronas announced what analysts felt amounted to a bailout of Mahathir's son Mirzan. Back then, Mirzan's main public listed company, shipping concern Konsortium Perkapalan Bhd (KPB), was floundering, with debts estimated at about RM1.7 billion. Its share price had fallen to RM3.78 by February 1998, a fraction of its pre-financial crisis level of RM17 plus.

The Petronas-controlled national shipping carrier Malaysian International Shipping Corp Bhd (MISC) stepped in to bail out KPB for cash, mainly by acquiring debt-laden KPB's shipping assets.

Under Mahathir's tenure, Petronas also financed the then tallest buildings in the world, the Petronas Twin Towers, much to the consternation of critics who felt the money could have been better used. It was completed in 1998, just in time for the 1998 financial meltdown, at a cost of some RM1.8 billion.

Petronas is also heavily involved in the multibillion-ringgit development of the new - and extravagant - administrative capital, Putrajaya, with its artificial lakes and bridges and imposing monuments. It is one of the shareholders of Putrajaya Holdings Sdn Bhd, the main developer for Putrajaya. Apart from the concessions for government complexes/buildings and the residential and commercial development projects in Putrajaya, Putrajaya Holdings is also responsible for "the development of infrastructure, and landmark projects such as the Dataran Putra (Putra Square), Putra Mosque, Putra Bridge, the Putrajaya Lake and the Wetlands".

Another controversy hung over Petronas, soon after the opposition Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS) captured the east-coast state of Terengganu in 1999. The Mahathir administration decided that it would no longer pay oil royalties to the state government based on offshore extraction. Instead, the money would be classified as "goodwill money" to be distributed directly by the federal government to the people in that state - a move which sparked an uproar from the state government as the royalties were Terengganu's main source of income.

For all its oil wealth, Terengganu ranks among the poorest states in Malaysia, and that is perhaps one of the contributing reasons for its fall to opposition hands in 1999. According to the World Bank, half all of all of Malaysia's poor households are concentrated in Terengganu, Kelantan and Sabah, where the poverty rates are 33 percent, 27 percent, and 18.5 percent respectively.

In March 2000, Petronas again hit the headlines when it sealed a deal to buy 27.2 percent of national car maker Perusahaan Otomobil Nasional Bhd, or Proton, for about RM1 billion (US$264 million), making it the controlling shareholder. The stake was held by the DRB-Hicom Group Bhd, which was deeply in debt. The deal was announced after Proton, one of Mahathir's pet projects, reported a net loss of RM19 million in the nine months to December 31, 1999.

Petronas was also used to secure the title sponsorship rights for the Malaysian Formula 1 Grand Prix and to sponsor the Sauber Petronas racing team. These were projects that Mahathir cherished as an attempt to market Malaysia around the world - while critics dubbed them wasteful.

Thus, it is hardly surprising that many Malaysians raised their eyebrows at Mahathir's appointment as Petronas adviser so soon after his retirement. It leaves the former premier with an influential say in Petronas' management and skeptics wondering who will have the final say in the way it uses the considerable funds at its disposal.

(Copyright 2003 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Dec 10, 2003



 

         
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong