Southeast Asia

Fears of Mekong free-for-all as China goes it alone
By Alan Boyd

SYDNEY - China and Myanmar have opted to stay outside a prominent agency overseeing development of the Mekong Basin, as six riparian states prepare to invest billions of dollars in infrastructural projects.

Diplomats said the two countries had rebuffed the latest overtures from the Mekong River Commission (MRC), evoking fears that poor management controls might lead to conflict over resources.

The MRC is widely viewed as the grouping most suited to fill the regulatory hole in Indochina as the growth zone of 60 million people prepares to establish a landbridge with the rest of Southeast Asia. Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and China are expected to spend as much as $100 billion harnessing the region's economic potential, starting with a $1 billion package of transport, telecommunications and energy projects.

Outside cash will have to be found for the next phase. But investors have been put off by the lack of a representative body that can institute an independent framework of checks and balances.

Although many schemes will have an impact outside the countries where they are sited, there is no common legal code, limited disputes procedures and no agency capable of ensuring that smaller states - or river communities - are not trampled in the headlong development rush.

"Transboundary resource management requires cooperative international mechanisms. These international frameworks for the Mekong region are unfortunately uncoordinated, overlapping and driven mostly by economic and political interests rather than environmental ones," lawyer Tashi Tsering noted in a recent study of the Mekong's management structure.

Initial investment is being overseen separately by the MRC and the Greater Mekong Sub-Region (GMS), an initiative established 10 years ago by the Asian Development Bank (ADB) to capitalize on the end of Cold War tensions.

The MRC's main contribution has been in the energy field, with a capital-intensive network of hydroelectric dams that centers on a massive exploitation of Laotian tributaries of the Mekong. Other projects, mostly related to improved navigation, are being devised by the Golden Quadrangle, a loose forum between Thailand, Laos, Burma and China that was set up in 1993.

Then there is the ASEAN-Mekong Basin Development Cooperation, dating from 1995, with a mandate to integrate farming, mining, forestry, industry, transport, telecommunications, energy, tourism, trade and investment activities.

In addition, the ADB is promoting specific development assistance for Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia through the Forum for Comprehensive Development in Indochina, which dates back to 1993 and is mostly backed by Japanese aid groups.

Apart from the ADB, at least five other lending agencies are active in Indochina: International Bank for Reconstruction And Development (IBRD); International Development Agency (IDA); International Finance Corporation (IFC); Multilateral International Guarantee Agency (MIGA); and Global Environment Facility (GEF).

Seven United Nations organizations have specific programs for developing the region, as do nine national governments. The latter generally operate through the MRC or the various ADB plans.

Yet none of these agencies has a monitoring function outside its own programs, and there have been no concerted efforts at consensus planning, a shortcoming that concerns some aid donors.

"It is unrealistic to suggest that aid programming should not include significant infrastructure projects. Notwithstanding this, the development plans for the basin advanced by agencies such as the ADB and the MRC, if implemented, will result in a region that has far greater potential for serious resource conflicts," warned Australia's state-owned AusAID in a project evaluation.

Other than the GMS schemes, development has so far been predominantly at the behest of individual governments, with little or no consultation being undertaken outside their borders.

China has constructed two hydropower dams on the upper Mekong, which it calls Lancang, without offering compensation for reduced water flows to farmers and fishermen further downriver. Vietnam built the Yali Falls dam without considering the possible repercussions on Cambodia's important Tonle Sap system. Few impact studies have been undertaken for Laos' 20 dam projects.

Thailand has not invited countries downstream to participate in planning for its proposed diversion of 2.2 billion cubic meters of water per year from the Kok and Ing rivers in the Mekong Basin.

The MRC has a disputes mechanism, but it is useless without the involvement of China and Myanmar, even though the lower four countries comprise 77 percent of the basin's total area and account for more than 80 percent of water flow. Myanmar has spurned the MRC because it has only a token involvement in the basin. China's motivations are more complex, but are believed to be related to the body's traditional domination by Thailand and Vietnam.

"Frankly, there is very little in it for the PRC. The risk is that it would expose itself to closer scrutiny by the neighbors, whereas now it can act with total impunity in the infrastructure sector," said a diplomat. Thailand gained the ascendency in the MRC after an acrimonious showdown with Vietnam over water sharing in the early 1990s that came to a head with the proposed re-admission of Cambodia following the end of its civil war. The outcome was the 1995 Agreement on Cooperation for the Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Basin, a landmark accord that laid a basis for joint development of resources.

However, it also ensured that this development would be undertaken in compliance with the national objectives of its two strongest members, while Laos and Cambodia effectively became client states. In the most graphic illustration of this unequal marriage, Laos was positioned as a significant hydroelectric producer on the understanding that almost all output would go to the Thai power grid. "Whereas the previous agreement gave any one member country the right to veto another's project if concerned about adverse impacts, the new agreement only gives member countries the right to prior notification and consultation," said Tashi. "For example, the lower riparian states' (the weaker states') concerns for flood control, management and mitigation are given only secondary importance compared to Thailand's concerns for hydropower development under MRC's Water Resources and Hydrology Program.

"And the commission's relationship to its non-party members, particularly China, reflects Thailand's relation to those states," he said.

GMS and the Golden Quadrangle both had their origins in attempts to bridge the dialogue gap between the four downstream and two upstream states, but have had only partial success.

While the GMS encompasses all riparian states, it is weakened by the ADB's unwillingness to act as a coordinator with the MRC; apparently deterred by the MRC's lack of accountability, ADB deals directly with individual countries.

Similarly, the Golden Quadrangle has snubbed Cambodia and Vietnam, reportedly to avoid political strains between Hanoi and Beijing, which faced off over Cambodia in the 1970s and 1980s. Five of the six Mekong states are members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), while the sixth - China - consults regularly through the ASEAN Plus 3 dialogue.

But ASEAN has not shown any inclination to take a leadership role in the Mekong Basin, having added Indochina to its list of special economic zones only a few years ago.

"ASEAN is in the unique position of having a dual mandate - it has political clout as well as economic - and can help close the development gap between its northern and southern halves," said an Asian diplomat. "It is unfortunate that some countries prefer to take a unilateral approach, even though we know this works against the spirit of sharing resources [and] the overriding desire to avoid potential conflict."

(©2002 Asia Times Online Co, Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact content@atimes.com for information on our sales and syndication policies.)
 
Nov 16, 2002



 

Affiliates
Click here to be one)

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.