WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    South Asia
     Feb 27, 2009
Page 2 of 2
THE ROVING EYE
Backstage at the theater of 'terror'
By Pepe Escobar

Soviet pull out, on February 15: "I believe that the war was a huge and in many respects irreparable political mistake of the leadership of the Soviet Union at the time."

Nowadays, Gromov stresses "the Moscow region regularly sends humanitarian aid to Afghanistan". If Obama placed a call to Gromov he would hear a few sobering words: persist in your "strategy" and you and NATO will be defeated at the "graveyard of empires".

The freedom fighters return
Unlike standard Obama rhetoric, Afghanistan is not the "central

 

front in the war on terror". The key to the riddle lies in the middle-echelons of the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) and the army. The ISI "invented" the Taliban - and the middle to upper ranks, as well as some Pashtun army officers, continue to fully support not only the "historic" Taliban of the Mullah Omar group but the neo-Taliban of the Baitullah Mehsud and Maulana Sufi Mohammed varieties.

The problem is Washington has no leverage, no credibility and no inside intelligence to conduct a wide-ranging purge of the ISI and the Pakistani army.

And then there's the problem of endemic Afghan corruption. If you supply 93% of the world's opium, you are definitely a narco-state. The Taliban may not control the complex web of poppy cultivation - but they profit from its transportation and smuggling.

The Northern Alliance, hegemonic in the Kabul power game, is directly involved, as much as the Pashtun family of President Hamid Karzai. An extra measure of Washington's puzzlement in Afghanistan is that a new "solution" being floated involves getting rid of Karzai and installing a new asset/puppet dictator.

Obama - even without being familiar with the Afghanistan-Pakistan theater - has got to be clever enough to see the surge per se as a suicidal gambit. The problem is he still seems to believe the war is "winnable". His latest definition of "winning", during his short visit to Canada, is "to defeat al-Qaeda" and to make sure the Afghanistan-Pakistan theatre is not a "launching pad for attacks against North America". So, if that is the mission he must acknowledge, the key node is Pakistan, not Afghanistan.

To the detriment of romanticized politics, 9/11 was never organized in a cave in Afghanistan; it was plotted in cells in Germany and Spain by Saudis and Pakistanis, with not a single Afghan among them. All subsequent attacks were planned basically in Western Europe, not in Afghanistan.

For its part, "historic" al-Qaeda today has nothing to do with a terror-oriented Citigroup; it is composed by no more than a few dozen shadowy figures - including Ayman al-Zawahiri - most probably hiding in the Waziristans and the enormous empty spaces of Balochistan.

Obama's problems are compounded by the fact that he is surrounded by people, such as Pentagon supremo Robert Gates, that remain locked in "war on terror"/Long War mode. Vice President Joe Biden and special envoy to the Afghanistan-Pakistan theater Richard Holbrooke - not to mention General David "I'm positioning myself for 2012" Petraeus - are certified hawks. They will do everything in their power to steer the conclusions of the Afghanistan strategic policy review Obama is waiting for towards the Long War concept .

For Andrew Bacevich, professor of International Relations and History at Boston University, the last hope for sanity is represented by Senator John Kerry, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations committee.

It's never enough to stress the Bush "war on terror" framework remains in full effect. Leon Panetta, the Obama nominee as CIA director, said that the CIA will basically continue with extraordinary renditions. Elena Kagan, the Obama nominee for solicitor general, said that indefinite detention without trial still rules - wherever the detainee was captured. And acting Assistant Attorney General Michael Hertz said that detainees in Bagram air base in Afghanistan remain without legal rights. If Obama is serious about closing Guantanamo, he must be serious about closing Bagram.

The two-fold, "Western alliance" strategy at the Afghanistan-Pakistan theater, as it stands, consists of the US and NATO occupying the parts of Afghanistan not occupied by the Taliban while Washington bribes Islamabad to let it attack Pashtun peasants inside Pakistan's Federally Administrated Tribal Areas (FATA).

No wonder that after de facto losing a war in Iraq to a bunch of "irregulars" with Kalashnikovs, the Pentagon is now terrified that NATO is about to lose the war in Afghanistan for good, thus proving to the whole world its absolute irrelevancy - and shattering once and for all the shaky pillar of US hegemony over Europe.

NATO is incompetent even at lying. A NATO report in January claimed that "only" 973 civilians were killed in Afghanistan in 2008, and "only 97" of these by NATO. This month a UN report confirmed that NATO was lying. According to the UN, at least 2,118 Afghan civilians were killed in 2008 - 828 of them by the US or NATO.

Everyone's talking about US fighter jets and CIA Predator drones raising hell out of three secret Pakistani air bases - with Islamabad's complicit silence. But nobody talks about the "humint", or human intelligence, component of the US's covert war in Afghanistan, conducted by what the New York Times defines, with spectacular hypocrisy, as "military units operating outside the normal chain of command".

US special forces are part of this deadly mix. A recent UN report identifies these US commandos as the key culprits as far as the killing of Afghan civilians is concerned. Washington happens to identify similar outfits - if they operate under a different banner, or religion - as "terrorists".

In the case of this new American breed, it's fair to expect the Pentagon and the Washington establishment to sooner or later start calling them - in a sinister echo of recent Afghan past - "freedom fighters".

Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge. His new book, just out, is Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).

He may be reached at pepeasia@yahoo.com.

(Copyright 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

1 2 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110