South Asia

Bihar: The privatization of terror
By Sanjay K Jha

For over two decades the State of Bihar has been home to one of the most extraordinary social aberrations in the history of independent India: the "private armies" raised by upper-caste landowners to protect their feudal privileges. Among the most powerful of a succession of these private armies is the Ranvir Sena, which has terrorized large areas of the state since its formation in September 1994 at the Belaur village of Bhojpur district.

On August 29, 2002, however, the Ranvir Sena was effectively "decapitated" with the arrest of its chief, Brahmeshwar Singh, at Patna. Singh carried a reward of half a million Indian rupees (US$10,300) on his head, and is accused in numerous criminal cases, including those concerned with the killing of some 200 persons. A founding member of the Sena, he took over the leadership of the Ranvir Kisan Sangharsh Samiti, an organization created to protect landowner interests in Central Bihar in 1994, and turned it into the one of the most lethal private armies in the state. He first came into the limelight after the massacre of 22 persons in Bathani Tola village of Bhojpur district on July 11, 1996.

Singh's arrest is not the first setback for the Sena in recent times. On August 24, 2002, three of its front-ranking leaders were killed by left-wing extremists - Naxalites - of the People's War Group (PWG) in Pariyari village in Arwal district, once considered to be a bastion of the Ranvir Sena.

Reports indicate that the Ranvir Sena has been at the receiving end for some time now, and has lost much of its earlier influence among upper caste landowners. One of the reasons is the increasing criminalization of the outfit. A large number of unemployed lumpen youth and criminals joined the Sena after the Miyapur massacre of 34 persons on June 16, 2000, the last major massacre executed by the Ranvir Sena. Extortion from their own caste men, initially for the purchase of arms and ammunition, became rampant after this point, and those who refused to pay were subjected to reprisals.

Factional rivalry also increased within an increasingly undisciplined and criminalized cadre, as Brahmeshwar Singh began to lose control. Violence committed by the Ranvir Sena against its supporting caste men alienated a large number of upper caste landlords, and, over time, intra-caste rivalry and warring area chiefs began to dominate the Ranvir Sena's trajectory.

Though armed gangs have been part of feudal history of rural India, Bihar is the only state in post-independence India where private armies of landowners exist. Most of these private armies emerged in the late 1970s and 1980s as a feudal response to the growth of various left-wing extremist - Naxalite - movements in the central and the southern (now known as the state of Jharkhand) parts of Bihar. Over the past two decades, an estimated 15 private armies have existed at various points of time in the state, including prominently: the Kuer Sena, the Bhumi Sena, Lorik Sena, Sunlight Sena, Bramharshi Sena, Kisan Sangh, Gram Suraksha Parishad and the Ranvir Sena. Clashes between these outfits and various left-wing extremist groups have left hundreds dead and many more maimed over the past two decades.

Among all of these the Ranvir Sena emerged as the most dreaded and ruthless group as it battled the rising strength of left-wing extremist groups, especially the Communist Party of India, Marxist-Leninist (CPI-ML) (Liberation). The forerunners of the Ranvir Sena in Bhojpur were the Bramharshi Sena, Kuer Sena, Kisan Morcha and Ganga Sena. These groups, however, with a limited cadre strength and area of operation, could not sustain their existence for long and eventually withered away. Over the years, the Ranvir Sena extended its influence to the Jehanabad, Patna, Rohtas, Aurangabad, Gaya, Bhabhua and Buxur districts, mobilizing the landed caste groups in these districts against the various left-wing extremist organizations.

Proscribed by the state government since August 1995, the Ranvir Sena is highly organized and its cadres are reportedly better paid than any of the private armies in the past. Landowners in central Bihar finance the Ranvir Sena through generous subscriptions. The Sena also runs a front organization, the Ranvir Kisan Maha Sangh and a women's wing, whose members are trained in the use of arms.

Over the years, the Ranvir Sena has carried out a number of massacres in central Bihar. On June 16, 2000, its cadres killed 34 persons at Miapur village, Aurangabad district. On April 21, 1999, 12 persons were killed at Sendani village, Gaya district. On February 20, 1999, 11 persons were killed at Narayanpur village, Jehanabad district. On January 25, 1999, 23 persons were massacred in Sankarbigha village, Jehanabad district. On December 1, 1997, 58 persons were massacred at Lakshmanpur-Bathe village, Jehanabad district. On April 10, 1997, 10 persons were killed at Ekbari village, Jehanabad. And on March 23, 1997, Ranvir Sena cadres killed 10 persons at Habispur village, Patna district. The Sena's victims, by and large, have been landless and poor peasants of the most backward castes.

The state government, on its part, failed to contain the activities of the Ranvir Sena, at least in some measure, because of the Sena's strong links with the political structure and administration. The context of the Sena's activities has been conditioned by an extreme polarization of state politics and the bureaucracy on the basis of caste. This polarization deepened in the 1980s, when the dalits were mobilized by the left-wing extremists and increasingly stereotyped as Naxalites by the upper castes who banded together. The result was a closing of ranks, not only among the richer and landowners, but also along caste lines that embraced every rung of the social ladder, down to the poorest of the castemen. It was through these alliances that the Ranvir Sena emerged, representing the same forces that dominate the state's structures of power.

The Ranvir Sena's success was also owed in part to the degeneration that had crept into the left-wing extremism. The Naxalite movement, which once challenged the authority of historically entrenched classes, had also gradually become caught up in the same vortex of caste politics, and the confrontation at the grassroots level is now molded by caste factors and not by class ideology.

This pattern of politics remains intact in Bihar, and the succession of recent shocks to the Ranvir Sena are not symptomatic of any fundamental transformations. The forces that gave rise to the Ranvir Sena are still in control of the socio-political and administrative structures in Bihar, and these will reassert themselves, either through a resurgence of the Ranvir Sena, or the emergence and consolidation of another private army on the already violent canvas of state politics.

Sanjay K Jha, Research Associate, Institute for Conflict Management, a non-profit society set up in 1997 in New Delhi committed to the evaluation and resolution of problems of internal security in South Asia

Published with permission from the South Asia Intelligence Review of the South Asia Terrorism Portal

 
Sep 5, 2002



 

Affiliates
Click here to be one)

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright Asia Times Online, 6306 The Center, Queen’s Road, Central, Hong Kong.