WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Oct 22, 2009
Page 2 of 2
Iran trapped in a ring of unrest
By Mahan Abedin

Intelligence sources in Tehran contend that most of the "effective" members of the group (including Rigi's brother Abdul-Hamid) are currently in detention, where they have disclosed significant amounts of information. Based on this information, the IRGC has conducted operations on the eastern fringes of the province and put in place security arrangements that have made it harder for the group to conduct regular hit-and-run operations across the border.

Moreover, the Ministry of Intelligence has also been involved, in the form of recruiting and placing agents inside the group as part of a broader effort of sabotaging Jundallah's long-term aspirations and constraining its operational environment.

According to intelligence sources in Tehran, evidence of Jundallah's links to American secret agents and Pakistani state

  

actors, in particular agents of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), is numerous and beyond dispute. American secret agents, namely agents of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and highly specialized and secret branches of the United States military, have met key Jundallah operatives and commanders on numerous occasions in remote hideouts on the western fringes of Pakistani Balochistan. Moreover, the Americans have supplied the group with communication devices, in particular encrypted laptops, and large sums of cash in the form of US dollar notes.

More intriguingly, the training received by Jundallah militants in Pakistan is far more intelligence-oriented than the type of military and indoctrination training provided by Pakistani extremist groups. Details of the training - coupled with confessions by detained members - have led Iranian investigators to conclude that Jundallah has received training in ISI facilities by ISI trainers.

The type of training undergone by Jundallah members is closely related to secret intelligence activity, including conducting and deterring surveillance; constructing and managing cellular activity; communicating via encrypted laptops (the encryption is multi-layered and crucially it is bespoke, which is not widely commercially available); gathering and reporting information in quick time and in hostile environments; and counter-interrogation techniques.

In addition, the militants had undergone rudimentary military training and acquired the skills needed to conduct assassinations, mass kidnapping, preparing and deploying car bombs, and crucially, recruiting, priming and deploying suicide bombers.

Significantly, Iranian investigators have not detected overt direction by either Pakistani or American agents. Moreover, it is believed that the group's more low-key attacks (in particular hit-and-run attacks across the border) are more a reaction to pressure applied by organized crime gangs than any other factor.

Jundallah has strong ties to Pakistani, Afghan and Iranian Baloch drug barons and other organized criminals. Enabling a more permissive environment for organized criminals - for instance by distracting Iranian border guards, the Law Enforcement Agency and the IRGC in hit-and-run attacks - brings in much-needed cash and is believed to be the group's biggest source of finance.

Balochistan: A strategic conundrum
In recent years, the Iranian government and Iranian civil society have grappled with the problem of how to resolve or at least alleviate the manifold problems in Sistan and Balochistan. The disaffected people in the under-developed province are partially right to point out that both state and society were roused into action as a result of one unpopular group's terrorist actions.

Owing to the sheer complexity of the problems - and the threat posed to local community cohesion by Jundallah terrorism - the provincial government was forced to cede much of its authority to the IRGC, which has a proven track record of restoring security and stability to troubled border provinces both through military strength and crucially the establishment of community-based security architectures.

But Sistan and Balochistan poses a set of historical and strategic challenges that the IRGC - despite its best efforts - is unlikely to be able to overcome on its own. The province has been a headache for the modern Iranian nation-state for the past century and any multi-faceted strategic response must take stock of this troubled historical heritage.

Arguably the biggest local challenge is organized crime, in particular the daily transit of narcotics across the border with Pakistan and Afghanistan. In September 2007, a senior Iranian intelligence officer told this author that in a meeting with a top Pakistani Balochi drug baron in 2003 in Dubai in the United Arab Emirates, the Iranians were offered a tantalizing deal. For unmolested trafficking of narcotics across the Iran-Pakistan border, the drug lords were willing to pay the Iranian government an annual tax of US$1 billion; promised not to distribute any of the contraband within Iran and pledged to hunt down and kill "enemies of the state" (namely armed Iranian Balochi secessionists) in Pakistani Balochistan.

Interestingly, the meeting had been brokered by the ISI; and only took place after Pakistani guarantees that they would prevent hostile American surveillance. The senior intelligence officer told this author that his curt response to the offer by the drug baron was that "I deal with God, not with you".

This account is credible considering that Jundallah emerged on the scene at around the same time and has forged very strong ties to an assortment of Iranian, Pakistani and Afghan organized crime gangs.

Beyond addressing the challenges and adverse dynamics inside Sistan and Balochistan, the Iranian government must address the very serious challenges posed by the evolving regional strategic environment. While Jundallah thrives on its relationship with organized crime gangs, its suicide bombing operations and overtly sectarian rhetoric is a direct consequence of the havoc unleashed in Afghanistan and Pakistan by American policies after the September 11, 2001, assault on the United States

Whether the Americans direct Jundallah to conduct terrorist operations in Iran is irrelevant at this point. What is significant is that they have created a strategic environment in which such attacks are both practically and ideologically possible, and no doubt - and notwithstanding perfunctory condemnation of terrorist acts - the Americans rub their hands with glee every time there is a major terrorist incident in Iran.

To emerge victorious in the long term, the Iranian government would be well advised to articulate and implement an alternative strategic vision for the region. In the aftermath of the September 11, 2001 attack the previous Iranian government led by the liberal reformist Mohammad Khatami hastily condemned the attack and through its words created the impression that the Islamic Republic acquiesced to an American-led intervention in Afghanistan. This has led many regional actors - including those who are potentially Iran's allies - to claim that the Iranians "collaborated" with the United States. While any real collaboration was likely minimal, the impression has endured and inflicted significant damage on the prestige of the Islamic Republic.

While Iran has little in common with the Taliban in Afghanistan and an assortment of extremist outfits in Pakistan, the crucial point is that these actors do not pose a strategic threat to the Islamic Republic. In any case, articulating opposition to American and North Atlantic Treaty Organization-led operations in the region do not amount to condoning the actions of their immediate opponents. The long and arduous route to defeating organized criminals, armed secessionists and political and religious extremists in Sistan and Balochistan lies in actively lobbying for the exit of foreign forces from the region.

Mahan Abedin is a senior researcher in terrorism studies and a consultant to independent media in Iran. He is currently based in northern Iraq, where he is helping to develop local media capacity.

(Copyright 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

1 2 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2009 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110