WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Middle East
     Mar 2, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Chalabi now puts Iraq first


happened frequently - yet they have not responded. That is a significant factor.

This outcome did not happen in a vacuum. There was major effort to persuade the Sadrists. Many people participated in it. There were feted at meetings with the mayor of Sadr City - who is not part of the Sadrist movement of the Mehdi Army, but he has authority from them to pursue these meetings - and the multinational force, and political officers from the [US] embassy.

All these are positive developments, because there have been many provocations. Today [Tuesday] there was, for example, an



attack in the morning by the 6th Battalion, which is under US command, on houses in Sadr City. The tension rose. There were contacts with the radicals and those 60 were released and the thing was resolved. This is the kind of work that is going on on a daily basis.

NIo: Now you say that these developments are positive. Can you qualify just how positive they are? Does it, in your view, signal that there could in the future be a decrease in tit-for-tat sectarian attacks?

AC: Look, these are beginnings. And they could easily be overturned. Let us not make any exaggerated claims at this stage, but they are positive beginnings.

Here is another issue: yesterday [Monday], in probably the most dangerous area of Baghdad - Hai'amil, or the "worker's quarter" in the southwest of the city - there are Shi'ites and Sunnis living there, and there was a protracted conflict between the Mehdi Army and the Sunni armed force in the area. There was tension. So we went there yesterday, along with the commander or the deputy commander of the Muqtada security clan, and we went there to a Sunni mosque and held a meeting. People saw that we were there. They came out of their homes and attended, and it was broadcast on Iraqi TV. It had a positive effect, and the parties agreed to form a committee and work normally, and the situation is quiet there now.

If we do not build on this, if we do not provide the people something - they have had no electricity for months, they've had no food distribution for months, they've have almost no fuel, they could not go out of their area - then I cannot guarantee anything.

But again, the sense is that people are fed up with the violence. They feel the brink and they don't like it. They are trying to work back from the brink.

Now the prime minister is supporting this effort very much, and he in fact has from his own Prime Minister's Office budget, he is granting a million dinars [US$781] to every family that returns that was forcibly evicted from their area. So many people are returning, and the moves that we made in returning mosques to various communities that were taken from them is helping secure this kind of feeling among the people there.

So the work is going on in the city at the popular level, and if there is to be successful reconciliation, I believe that it also has to be done in the neighborhoods among the neighbors who had been living together for many years and when this sectarian violence emerged, they began to fight each other. Let me emphasize to you that the areas of conflict in Baghdad are no more than 25 neighborhoods out of a total of 800.

NIo: Do you feel that the Maliki government has anyone on the Sunni side who could similarly serve as an informal interlocutor with armed Sunni groups, particularly the ones facing off with the Shi'ites? And does that person have the ties and credibility to similarly prevent Sunni retaliation and unprovoked attack on the Shi'ites?

AC: There is a Sunni politician, a senior figure in the Islamic Party, his name is Naseer al-Ali, who was vice president of the National Assembly, and he is working alongside me in those committees. He comes to all the meetings, and we are working together with all the communities.

NIo: Is there anything you would like to add?

AC: After security is improved, the Iraqi government has to take responsibility for providing a better output of products and services for the people.

This is something that needs to be thought about and addressed with some depth. We have now a decline in, as we speak, the amount of oil exported. We are now down to 1.3 million barrels a day; the budget is based on 1.6 million barrels a day at $50 a barrel, so we 20% below that. And we need serious consideration about the oil sector.

Note
1. Ahmad Abdel Hadi Chalabi (born October 30, 1944) was interim oil minister in Iraq in April-May 2005 and December-January 2006 and deputy prime minister from May 2005 until May 2006. Chalabi failed to win a seat in Parliament in the December 2005 elections, and when the new Iraqi cabinet was announced in May 2006, he was not awarded a post. Once dubbed the "George Washington of Iraq" by American neo-conservatives, he has fallen out of favor and is currently under investigation by several US government sources. He is also wanted for bank fraud in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan.

Chalabi was also part of a three-man executive council for the umbrella Iraqi opposition group, the Iraqi National Congress (INC), created in 1992 for the purpose of fomenting the overthrow of Iraqi president Saddam Hussein. Although the INC received major funding and assistance from the United States, it never had any influence or any following to speak of in Iraq after the 2003 invasion. The INC's influence gradually waned until the December 2005 elections, in which it failed to win a single seat in Parliament.

Chalabi is a controversial figure for many reasons. In the lead-up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq, under his guidance the INC provided a major portion of the information on which US Intelligence based its condemnation of Saddam, including reports of weapons of mass destruction and alleged ties to al-Qaeda. Much of this information has turned out to be false. That, combined with the fact that Chalabi subsequently gloated about the impact that their falsifications had in an interview with the British Sunday Telegraph, led to a falling out between him and the United States.
Initially, Chalabi enjoyed cozy political and business relationships with some members of the US government, including some prominent neo-conservatives within the Pentagon. Chalabi is said to have had political contacts within the Project for the New American Century, most notably with Paul Wolfowitz, a student of nuclear strategist Albert Wohlstetter and Richard Perle who was introduced to Chalabi by Wohlstetter in 1985. He also enjoyed considerable support among politicians and political pundits in the United States, most notably Jim Hoagland of the Washington Post, who held him up as a notable force for democracy in Iraq. Chalabi's opponents, on the other hand, see him as a charlatan of questionable allegiance, out of touch with Iraq and with no effective power base there. - Wikipedia

(Used by permission the National Interest online.)

(For the original article, click
here.)

 1 2 Back

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110