Search Asia Times

Advanced Search

 
Middle East

Pressure on Iran could backfire
By Saloumeh Peyman

TEHRAN - Diplomats might be optimistic about a breakthrough with Tehran over its nuclear program after weekend talks between Tehran and three European Union heavyweights, but realities are more complicated since many Iranians say their country has a legitimate right to have full access to nuclear technology.

The talks in Paris, between France, Germany and Britain, were seen by many as the last chance for Iran to reach an agreement that would avoid it being referred to the UN Security Council, and avert the risk of sanctions over its nuclear program.

According to reports, the Europeans are confident they will be able to persuade Iran to suspend its uranium enrichment program indefinitely as a way to ensure that it does not use the technology to produce a nuclear weapon. But Iran has insisted that the suspension be no longer than six months and sought assurances that it would not be asked to permanently revoke its right to have a nuclear energy program.

European envoys also stressed in Paris that Tehran must answer by the time the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) takes the issue up on November 25, and if it fails, Europe will back US calls to refer Iran to the UN Security Council.

The administration of US President George W Bush, which refuses to talk directly to the Iranian administration, accuses it of supporting terrorists and developing weapons of mass destruction. Washington, it seems, is keen to pursue sanctions and is pressing its allies to work on a Security Council resolution for that.

On Saturday, China gave Iran crucial backing by opposing US efforts to have the Islamic republic referred to the UN. "There is no reason to send the issue to the Security Council," Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing said at a press conference in Tehran with his Iranian counterpart, Kamal Kharazi.

"It would only make the issue more complicated and difficult to work out," Li said. The Chinese foreign minister refused to speculate on whether China would use its veto in the Security Council in the event of Iran's case being sent there.

Addressing himself directly to Bush at Friday prayers, three days after the US president was re-elected, Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said: "No sir, we are not seeking to have nuclear weapons. Our nuclear weapon is this country, and the youth of its people," added Khamenei.

Before the Paris talks, Iranian President Mohammad Khatami said Iran was ready to reach an agreement over its nuclear program. He said Tehran was ready to undertake not to pursue nuclear weapons - as long as Iran's right to have peaceful nuclear technology was recognized.

Early last week, IAEA head Mohammed ElBaradei said Iran should suspend its uranium enrichment program, and urged it to do so as a confidence-building measure. But 238 members of the Islamic Consultancy Assembly (majlis - parliament) are trying to pass a bill preventing Khatami's government from suspending the country's uranium enrichment program.

"European countries are imposing the suspension of uranium enrichment process and by doing this they are trying to demolish Iranian creativity in scientific fields," Hussain Mozaffar, a Tehran hardliner deputy in parliament, told the Jomhorieslami daily. "Today, our country is facing a dilemma trying to safeguard our self-esteem," he added.

A survey carried out by the official Keyhan daily indicated that 78.6% of Iranians polled are against any suspension - temporary or indefinite - of the country's nuclear program. They also indicated that Iran must not bow to pressures from either Europe or the IAEA.
More than 1,375 Iranian academics and nuclear scientists have signed a petition urging Khatami to stand firm in the negotiations and not compromise on what they call the "Iranian nation's legitimate right to have full access to peaceful nuclear technology".

On February 9, 2003, Iran's nuclear program and efforts for building sophisticated facilities at Natanz and several other cities, that would eventually produce enriched uranium, were revealed. China, in 1991, provided Iran with uranium hexafluoride - a uranium compound that is in a gaseous state which is used for enriching uranium. In addition, Iran recently acknowledged that it also received (again in 1991) from China 1,000 kilograms of natural uranium hexafluoride, 400 kilograms of uranium tetrafluoride, and 400 kilograms of uranium dioxide, without reporting them to the IAEA.

"Iranian scientists have managed to internalize nuclear technology in a way that is not irrevocable and the international community should accept it," said Iran's Atomic Energy Organization chief, Gholamreza Aghazadeh, in an interview.

At the same time, Aghazadeh is flexible in his own view: "We are not saying we are refusing offers to provide us with nuclear fuel, but we want also to produce our own nuclear fuel as well as buy what we lack from outside."

But US pressure on Iran has already attracted criticism from former White House officials. In an interview with the London-based Financial Times, Zbigniew Brzezinski, who was national security adviser to former US president Jimmy Carter, said he feared a second Bush administration would not hesitate to use force against Iran in order to deal what it sees as a "nuclear threat".

"Force will only unify the mullahs with the democratic opposition and derail political change in Iran," Brzezinski told the daily. "It may not stop Iran from buying nuclear weapons and will have adverse consequences in Iraq and Afghanistan."

(Inter Press Service)


Nov 9, 2004
Asia Times Online Community



China rocks the geopolitical boat
(Nov 6, '04)

Beyond the nuclear stalemate (Oct 30, '04)
 

 

 
   
         
No material from Asia Times Online may be republished in any form without written permission.
Copyright 2003, Asia Times Online, 4305 Far East Finance Centre, 16 Harcourt Rd, Central, Hong Kong