WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Korea
     Jun 5, 2010
Lee rapidly falls out of favor
By Andray Abrahamian

The sinking of the corvette Cheonan, a conservative president and elections have combined to create the most caustic online debate in South Korea's history.

Immediately ahead of South Korea's June 2 regional elections, the shattered hull of the Cheonan divided the nation.

This was a far cry from a few months earlier when the corvette, on duty near the Koreas' maritime border, was apparently hit by a North Korean torpedo, claiming 46 lives. Public opinion wasn't

 
split then as polls showed that more than 70% of the public supported President Lee Myung-bak's North Korea policy.

Lee's canny handling of the situation looked set to translate into a broad victory for his conservative Grand National Party (GNP), with large leads in key elections. Instead, they lost several races and the Seoul mayoral race was decided by a whisker. So what happened?

The large lead in the polls, combined with gorgeous weather and a day off from work, may have lulled the conservative base that the Cheonan incident had seemed to revitalize into being less committed on the day. Some editorials suggested that perhaps a rare day out with the family took precedence over civic duty. Others speculated that the polls were poorly conducted or not answered honestly. Others speculated that "hidden votes", apparently uncountable by polls, had somehow surfaced without warning.

But one thing is clear: not for the first time, there was an online war between Lee and left-wing netizens. Lee lost again.

The run-up
Before the sinking of the Cheonan on March 26, the opposition labeled the election as a "referendum on Lee's presidency so far". With a mishandling of public opinion regarding US beef imports and mad cow disease, pressure on Internet and press freedoms, as well as an unpopular plan for a grand canal down the length of the country, this seemed like a good line on which to base opposition candidates' talking points.

The Cheonan, however, reshaped the election. Lee campaigned for president partly on a platform of reversing the "Sunshine" policy of the two previous presidents. Under this policy, reconciliation with the North was the main theme. South Korean investment and aid exploded in the 2000s, but with no resolution to North Korea's nuclear issue, most voters supported Lee's claims that the South had given too much, with nothing in return. He promised to take a tougher line and link aid and trade with results on other issues.

Now, with his other faults shifted to the background, Lee had a chance to focus on the issue that garnered him so much support in the 2007 election. Would the public support his hard line in a time of crisis?

All the polls said they did. Lee, in terms of the domestic polity, handled the crisis brilliantly. In the days immediately following the sinking of the Cheonan, Internet chat rooms, coffee shops and news pages exploded with all manner of debate, theories and criticisms. Everything was on the table, from US friendly fire to hitting a rock to encountering an old mine.

The Lee administration was being reserved with information, cagey even, and officials contradicted one another. This caused a degree of suspicion and mistrust among the public, reflected in an eight-point dip in the polls for Lee.

In early April, Lee began communicating more clearly. He got his defense minister on the same page (he had been claiming North Korea almost right away) expressing that it was too early to draw any kind of conclusions. The investigation team assembled was international and included non-military personnel. The government, little by little, began publicizing the suspicion that the sinking was North Korea's doing. They leaked information as the investigation went along, allowing public opinion to gradually adjust to the conclusion, rather than fueling anger with harsh rhetoric early on.

Meanwhile, as the investigation continued, some candidates questioned in advance what the findings would be. This came to an abrupt end when results of the investigation were released on May 20. The displayed propeller and shaft of a torpedo, with Korean writing on it, was evidence too strong to deny outright.

Most of the opposition candidates, unable to criticize the evidence without implicitly accusing the Lee administration of some sort of fraud, returned to other election issues. (Though they did vocally complain about the timing of the report - less than two weeks before the election - and Lee's supposed inability to guard the country.) The poll numbers for the Grand National Party (GNP) incumbent for mayor of Seoul, Oh Se Hoon, continued to rise, becoming an 18-point lead. The GNP also had large leads in all the contestable races.

In the following days, Lee's strong response to the findings was made clear: a cessation of all trade except the Kaesong Industrial Complex, no North Korean vessels allowed in South Korea's waters, a more aggressive military posture combined with a diplomatic push for more sanctions.

Polls said 71% of people trusted the results and only 26% thought the incident was being misused for political gain. The GNP was aware of the danger of this, too, as an internally circulated document warned of overusing the issue. Lee's executive handling of the incident was well supported. The GNP's strategic use of the timing to rally conservative voters without overdoing it was going well.

Then on election day, the opposition won 10 out of 16 races. The GNP won Seoul by less than 1%.

Lee vs the Internet, again
With mainstream media unable to credibly criticize the evidence, the real debate retreated to the Internet, where doubts about the investigation blossomed. Blogs and message boards, the bane of Lee's presidency since the 2008 mad cow protests, blew up with self-reinforcing memes: "Lee is using the Cheonan to push the North Korea agenda he always wanted," "the Americans and Lee are covering up a friendly fire incident", "the writing on the torpedo is too new and clean to have been underwater for almost two months". Someone even released an iPhone application that superimposes the "1?" (number 1) on photos: "turn anything you take a picture of into North Korean-made!" reads the product description.

Somewhere among the doubts, rumors and mistruths a chord was struck with independent and left-leaning voters - a chord that didn't show up in the polls. Something about Lee's handling of the incident seemed dishonest. Perhaps his counter-measures went too far. Perhaps the evidence was a little too good. Perhaps Lee's chilling of relations contributed to the attack.

As the intensity of the Internet buzz continued unabated, at the last minute, people who leaned towards trusting the government turned around and voted for the opposition. Young people, who the left traditionally needs to motivate if they hope to win, were probably most susceptible to the online rumor-mill and seemed to have turned out.

For all of Lee's deft handling of the situation to date, the government's biggest mistake may have been to announce that it was going to investigate Internet users spreading false information through Internet bulletin boards and blogs. The administration appeared to be overreacting and the fear was that legitimate dissent would be swept up in the dragnet that was trawling for libelous writers.

During the massive US beef mad cow protests of spring 2008, which were initially organized in a leaderless, grassroots fashion online, Lee struggled to appease public opinion. Later that year the government instituted the "real name registration system", wherein netizens must register using their national ID on websites with more than 100,000 users. This then aided in the 2009 arrest and failed prosecution of a blogger called Minerva, who has an uncanny knack for predicting economic events and was critical of the government.

Two days before the election, the Defense Ministry announced that it would invite 70 influential bloggers to view the wreck of the Cheonan in order to combat online rumor-mongering. This attempt to shift the tone of the online debate came too late, however.

The election is now past and the results will make the GNP wish it had kept the investigation quietly going into mid-June. Far from the reaffirmation Lee sought on his North Korea policy, left-wing netizens found a way to get voters to rebuke him.

Lee has always had a combative relationship with online critics. The Cheonan and regional elections were the latest defeat in that battle.

Andray Abrahamian is a doctoral candidate at the University of Ulsan, South Korea.

(Copyright 2010 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

Pyongyang: Cheonan was false-flag sinking
Jun 4, 2010

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2010 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110