WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Korea
     Mar 20, 2008
Page 1 of 2
Olympic clock ticks for unified Korean team
By Brian Bridges

The Olympic Games, to be held in Beijing in August, are already omnipresent. As nations from around the world finish preparing and selecting athletes for Beijing, one focus of attention will be the representation from China's neighbors, the two Koreas.

With the support and encouragement of the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the two Koreas' National Olympic Committees (NOCs) have raised the possibility of fielding a joint team for the first time ever at an Olympics Games. However, despite several rounds of discussions both bilaterally and with IOC involvement, there has been no definitive agreement on this unified team and time has all but run out.

This article examines the prospects for the creation of a joint team against the background of six decades of sporting and

 
political competition, cooperation, and recrimination between the Republic of Korea (South Korea) and the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea).

Despite the ideal that "sport has nothing to do with politics", there is little doubt that the two are closely linked for divided nations, which by their very rationale are involved in a highly-charged competition for legitimacy with their other "part-nation". Under these circumstances, the Olympics inevitably become an arena for political maneuvering.

Two Koreas and the Olympics
Since their formal foundation in 1948, the North and South Korean states had been involved in a competitive struggle, which has found expression not just through the military clashes of the Korean War but also through diplomatic, economic and cultural means. Both governments initially adopted a "one Korea" policy, which in the Cold War environment meant that the South was recognized and supported by the United States and the West Europeans, while the North was similarly endorsed by the Soviet Union, China and the East Europeans. Neither Korea was admitted to the United Nations, but both worked hard to achieve support and recognition amongst the emerging "Third World" countries. Sport was no exception to this struggle for advantage, prestige and legitimacy.

Western sports, introduced into Korea in the late 19th century, were seen by some Korean modernizers as a useful means to promote national solidarity. Later, Japanese colonizers introduced some sports such as judo and table tennis as part of their attempt to "Japanize" Korean society. After liberation from Japanese rule, Koreans on both sides of the border sought international sporting recognition as avidly as they campaigned for diplomatic recognition.

Ha Nam-Gil and J A Mangan have commented that post-1945 South Korean sport was "closely linked to political priorities, purposes and personnel" and was "politically-driven, resourced and endorsed and it was the direct product of ... ideological purpose" [1]. This assessment could equally be applied to North Korean priorities. Sport represented a tangible means to showcase the proclaimed superiority of each political system in this intense bilateral rivalry for national and international legitimacy.

The South Korean National Olympic Committee (NOC) quickly applied for IOC recognition and even sent athletes to the 1948 London Olympics. The North made repeated attempts to gain IOC recognition for its own NOC, but was rebuffed on the grounds that there could not be more than one recognized NOC in any one country. In the late 1950s, as pressure began to build up from the Soviet bloc, the IOC began to shift towards favoring a joint Korean team on the German model [2]. But not until the 1964 Tokyo Olympics did both South Korea and, for the first time ever in the summer Olympics, North Korea send athletes. Yet, the latter actually withdrew after its athletes arrived in Japan, when some of them were disqualified, providing a last minute twist to what had been a series of complicated and contentious efforts over the previous three years to try to secure a joint Korean team for the Tokyo Olympics [3].

Intensifying competition
Subsequently, despite intermittent discussions over the following decades, the two Koreas have never fielded a joint Olympic teams. The North gained more from these failed talks in the early 1960s than did the South, since from the 1968 Olympics it was able to compete for the first time on an equal footing with the South. But in the 1970s the South became more adept diplomatically, waging a campaign which was to culminate in the 1981 IOC decision to award the 1988 Olympic Games to Seoul.

1988 Olympic poster
In fact, during the 1960s and 1970s the South Korean government of president Park Chung-hee used sports promotion as one of several means to create a national revival in the wake of the traumas of colonization and war. Labelled by some as the "father of modern sport", Park introduced a number of innovative sports policies at both the elite and mass level and the idea of hosting the Olympics originated during his years in office.

In North Korea, too, sporting activity became an important part of societal mobilization and development. Mass sports involving gymnastics became a regular feature of North Korean society. Nonetheless, throughout the 1960s and 1970s both Koreas remained relatively low key in terms of participating in international sporting events, with the notable example of the North Korean soccer team's almost legendary exploits in the 1966 World Cup in England (beating Italy 1-0).

Periods of relative rapprochement between the two Koreas frequently led to discussions of joint teams, but as the political atmosphere soured again, so too did the sporting talks splutter and fail. Even after the political breakthrough of the 1972 North-South Joint Declaration, efforts to develop sporting exchanges and even form joint teams failed. Sports organizations and facilities in the South had developed to the stage that it could host some international competitions, but, under pressure from the North, athletes from socialist countries did not participate.

Agreement failed to field a joint team for the 35th World Table Tennis Championships, held in Pyongyang in 1979, the first major international sporting event hosted by the North, and South Korean table tennis players were not admitted. This failure, and what was perceived internationally as North Korean intransigence, had two results: firstly, international sporting federations became wary of the North, which has not since hosted a major international sporting event, and, secondly, during the 1980s, socialist states became more willing to compete in international sporting events in the South.

The partial boycotts of the 1980 and 1984 Olympics and the IOC's determination to assure a boycott-free Olympics in Seoul made the 1988 Olympics a particular focus of controversy. The North Koreans, with particularly vocal support from Cuba, criticized the choice of Seoul on safety grounds. When the IOC refused to change venue, the North asked for a co-hosting arrangement. Both the South and the IOC rejected this proposal (not least because the Olympics are awarded to only one city), but the IOC showed some willingness to discuss the possibilities of some events being held in the North.

There followed during 1985-88 a series of convoluted discussions, which are described in impressive detail in Richard Pound's insider account [4]. At one stage the two Korean NOCs and the IOC came close to agreement over some preliminary rounds of sports being held in the North. But the offers were insufficient to satisfy the North and, although the IOC kept the door open until the very last minute, North Korean athletes did not participate in the Seoul Olympics. With the exception of Cuba, all other socialist countries sent athletes to Seoul and in the process helped to lay one of the foundations for what would become their diplomatic recognitions of the South during the course of the following four years.

The road to Beijing
The dream of a joint Korean Olympic team continued to remain just that, a dream. In fact, only twice, in the same year of 1991 at the World Table Tennis Championships held in Japan and the Junior World Football Championships in Portugal has a joint Korean team been fielded in a major international sporting event.

This achievement, which came at a time of renewed North-South political dialogue at the prime ministerial level, may have had a Chinese dimension, since joint cheering of each others' athletes by South and North Korean supporters attending the Beijing Asian Games in 1990 was an important impetus. Nevertheless, the joint teams were the result of "government contacts rather than purely civilian exchanges" and little in the way of sporting exchanges followed [5]. It is against this background that we consider the more recent Olympics.

The historic June 2000 summit between Kim Dae-jung and Kim Jong-il, in Pyongyang, opened the way for greater cooperation and collaboration in North-South Korean relations. Consequently, at the 2000 Sydney Olympics the two Koreas entered the Olympic stadiums under a joint flag (the so-called "unification flag", consisting of a blue outline of the undivided Korean Peninsula on a white background) and wearing identical uniforms at the opening ceremonies. It was an emotional moment for Koreans. However, the athletes competed as two separate national teams.

Subsequently, the North participated in the September 2002 Asian Games in Busan, the first ever such occasion for North Korean athletes to participate in an international sporting event in the South. That success seems in part to be due to the South's strategy of avoiding the complicated questions of a joint team and instead focusing on a joint parade at the opening and the participation of North and South Korean athletes in separate teams [6].

The newly-established "tradition" of a joint team entry was carried on to the 2003 Asian Winter Games in Aomori and the 2004 Athens Olympics Games. Although international tensions had been raised because of the crisis over the North's suspected nuclear-weapons development, from October 2002, both sides came together for these sporting events. For both countries, a desire to pass a political message to the United States may have contributed to this cooperation. Both North and South wished to show the United States that they could coordinate at a time of worsening US-North Korean tensions [7].

This, in turn, led to the revival of ideas to form a joint team for the 2006 Asian Games in Doha and the 2008 Beijing Olympics. Representatives of the two Korean NOCs met in Guangzhou in September 2005, where they agreed in principle on a unified team, in Macau in November 2005, and in December 2005 when they began a series of bilateral meetings in Kaesong, on the North-South Korean border. As in earlier talks, the IOC has actively encouraged bilateral dialogue and occasionally hosted trilateral talks. In June 2006 IOC president Jacques Rogge wrote to both Kim Jong-il and South Korean president Roh Moo-hyun urging them to cooperate in forming a unified team.

The missile tests by the North brought a halt to exchanges, but Rogge, in September, hosted the heads of the two NOCs at a meeting in Lausanne and included an offer to increase the number of athletic spots open to Koreans if there were to field a unified team. Once again, after the October nuclear test by the North, the two Koreas' athletes marched in together at the opening ceremony but competed separately at the Doha Asian Games. Nonetheless, at this time North Korea did openly convey to the IOC its support for South Korea's bid to host the 2014 Winter Olympics [8].

During 2007 formal inter-Korean talks on a joint Olympic team took place in Kaesong in February, with more informal contacts in Kuwait in April and in Hong Kong in June 2007, but no solution

Continued 1 2 


Serenading North Korea (Mar 13, '08)

China's 'Olympic approach' to refugees (Jan 26, '08)


1. The peculiar theology of black liberation

2. Sorry, I wasn't pessimistic enough

3. China and India: Oh to be different

4. Now the Tibet blame game begins

5. Obama's women reveal his secret

6. Preventing a financial crash

7. Khomeini's grandchild breaks her silence

8. The worst-case scenario - live

9. Two-horse race for Pakistan's hot seat

10. India wakes to a Tibetan headache

11. Trust goes down the drain

(24 hours to 11:59 pm ET, Mar 18, 2008)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110