WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
WSI
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Korea
     Feb 25, 2005
Roh receives mixed report card

SEOUL - Ready to enter his third year in office, President Roh Moo-hyun still faces a strong, debilitating challenge from years of economic doldrums and escalating tensions from North Korea's nuclear weapons ambitions.

Public surveys singled out the sagging economy as the biggest policy failure under the Roh administration for the past couple of years, while giving high marks to decentralization, social welfare, political reform and departure from authoritarian rule.

After serving two years of his single five-year term, Roh's approval rating hovers around 30% in most recent surveys due to the sluggish economy and the fresh crisis over North Korea's declaration on February 10 that it possesses nuclear weapons; it also announced an indefinite boycott of further six-party disarmament talks aimed at ending its nuclear weapons program. Pyongyang said, however, that it would be willing to rejoin the talks under certain unspecified conditions.

In a recent survey of 1,000 people by the state-run broadcaster KBS, 60.7% of the respondents said Roh did not do well in the past two years in office, while 37.5% responded positively.

The overwhelming majority of the respondents said the Roh government should do more to create jobs, enhance job security and increase facility investment for early economic recovery.

However, Roh has said he would not employ short-term measures to move the nation out of the economic doldrums caused by sluggish consumer spending, burgeoning non-performing loans, lack of facility investment, millions of credit delinquents and deepening economic polarization between the rich and poor and between big and small businesses.

Roh and his aides say they would not repeat the makeshift policies his predecessor, Kim Dae-jung, adopted as a means of escaping the financial crisis in late 1997, only to deepen the current economic woes.

The Kim government encouraged excessive use of credit cards, adopted the concept of a flexible labor market to create a huge number of non-regular workers and pursued policies that boosted the real estate market and caused skyrocketing realty prices.

At one time, Roh said he would stick to proven principles alone in dealing with the sagging economy, although the effect of such a policy will only bear fruit after the end of his term.

Roh's term expires on February 25, 2008, and he is not permitted to run for reelection under the constitution.

His critics allege Roh's pro-labor administration's hostile policy toward big businesses, such as the investment ceiling on chaebols, or big conglomerates, and the voting rights limit for chaebol-owned financial institutions, dampened business sentiments and led to the protracted economic doldrums.

Roh's chief policymaker, Kim Byong-joon, counters by saying the difficult economic conditions were triggered in part by the "false agenda" set by conservative media and scholars, who attributed the economic failure to the government's chaebol policy.

Kim, head of the policy planning bureau of Cheong Wa-dae (office of the president), asserted the government "will continue its role in overcoming the polarization of the big conglomerates, small and medium businesses and venture firms and help them grow side by side".

The official, however, admitted that the Roh administration had suffered from economic difficulties due mainly to "structural and cyclic factors" over the past two years since Roh took office.

On the North Korean nuclear issue, Roh has taken a progressive attitude to coax North Korea back into the six-party talks on ending its nuclear weapons programs, although he is not expected to actively seek an inter-Korean summit unless substantial progress is made on the North Korean nuclear issue at the six-party nuclear talks.

Roh took office in February 2003, just months after the latest nuclear crisis erupted in October the previous year when the United States denounced Pyongyang for having a secret highly enriched uranium-based nuclear weapons program, in addition to its existing plutonium-based weapons program.

Despite Roh's efforts to persuade the hardline administration of US President George W Bush to engage the North, Pyongyang escalated tensions over its nuclear programs on February 10 with a declaration that it was a nuclear power and had manufactured weapons in order to protect itself from what it called the hostile policy of the US.

Opposition parties described Roh's North Korea policy as a failure and demanded he put forth his position on the North's possession of nuclear weapons.

Roh has yet to express himself on the North's claim on nuclear weapons, and just ordered the government to "deal with the issue carefully".

He stunned the Bush administration on November 12 last year when he made a speech in Los Angeles on his way to the annual Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit in Santiago, Chile, urging Washington to abandon its hardline policy on North Korea. He also expressed understanding of the North's stated rationale for its development of nuclear weapons and missiles - to protect itself from outside threats, namely the US.

In his dealings with the US on other national security issues, Roh also earned high marks as he sought a more independent approach in the dispatch of 3,600 South Korean troops to Iraq as part of the US-led coalition in the war-torn Middle Eastern nation, and also urged the pullout of one third of 37,000 US troops and related personnel from the Korean Peninsula in the coming years.

After an intensive one-year negotiation for the US troop withdrawal, Washington pledged to invest over US$10 billion in a weapons system for the US troops in South Korea to compensate for the US troop removal.

Roh also successfully negotiated with the US to reduce the number and nature of the South Korean troops in Iraq to 3,600 noncombat troops, well down from the US request for 5,000 combat troops, meeting halfway between the US request and domestic public opinion against the troop dispatch to the Iraq war, which many said lacked justification.

The South Korean troops in Iraq, the third-largest among coalition partners only after the United States and Britain, serves as a major pillar of the Seoul-Washington alliance, according to Seoul and Washington officials.

Roh has tried to stay away from domestic political issues in order to depart from the authoritarian rule of his predecessors, leaving the prime minister and the ruling Uri Party leadership to handle most daily state affairs and domestic politics.

Professor Tom Plate of the University of California in Los Angeles said, "The record of the first two years of President Roh Moo-hyun's five-year term has been, to be honest, mixed."

Plate said, "There are many pros and some cons, but Roh seems earmarked for a special place in history because of his effort to depart from the imperial presidency."

Professor Yang Seung-ham of Yonsei University echoed Plate's theme, saying Roh's two years in office should be seen as a "half-success".

"The Roh administration achieved reform to a substantial degree, but it was a total failure in terms of national integration," Yang told a seminar. "Roh has a serious problem in dividing the people as our troops and enemies."

Deepening national division, along with economic malaise, were among the biggest failures of Roh's first two years in office, according to a recent survey of 121 lawmakers of the major opposition Grand National Party (GNP), a highly conservative and traditional grouping.

"The Roh administration's first two years turned out to be a total failure, as most of the GNP lawmakers picked economic failure, instable national security and national division as the most outstanding policy failures," a GNP spokesman claimed.

The opposition lawmakers, however, gave him high marks for sending troops to Iraq and making efforts to depart from the authoritarian rule of previous presidents.

The national division comes mostly from Roh's pursuit of ideology rather than pragmatism, critics said. They note that he has been overly ambitious after success in the April general elections and victory in the presidential impeachment battle last year in pushing ahead with the capital relocation and abolition of the anti-communist law, which are opposed by more than 60% of the population, according to public surveys.

Lim Chae-jung, chairman of the ruling Uri Party, admitted the ruling camp and government failed to seek national consensus in pursuit of the capital relocation project, which was ruled unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court last October.

Roh also failed to properly address deepening regionalism, Kim Byong-joon, Roh's chief policymaker, admitted.

"Regional rivalry not only triggers social conflict, but is also a stumbling block to the revision of the government and social systems," he said. "We will continue to make efforts to ease regional rivalry."

However, he was somewhat more upbeat on the ruling Uri Party having won more votes in the southeastern Gyeongsang provinces in last year's general elections, the home turf of the conservative opposition GNP. The Uri Party also swept the votes in the southwestern Jeolla provinces.

On the GNP's criticism that the Roh government is a "NATO" (No Action Talk Only) regime with more than 100 "road maps", Lim said, "We've spent the past two years to produce detailed road maps and you will from now on witness the real ability of the Roh administration."

Lim also put forth such achievements of the Roh administration as decentralization, an anti-corruption drive and departure from authoritarianism that was confirmed in a recent survey conducted by the Citizens Coalition for Better Government.

The survey of 308 professors, businessmen, politicians and artists, however, marked the overall performance of the Roh government as poor, with a grade of 2.54 on a 5-point scale.

Kim Byong-joon was not pleased with the ratings, insisting the Roh government focused on laying the infrastructure for reform of the statistics, communications systems and other national administration systems "that people cannot see easily".

"People will feel the effects of what we've done after the lapse of enough time," he said.

(Asia Pulse/Yonhap)


US alienation of Seoul
(Feb 23, '05)

The South Korean bombshell that wasn't
(Feb 11, '05)

Lowering Old Glory in S Korea
(Jan 22, '05)

Seoul Rowss against US tide
(Nov 24, '04)

 
 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2005 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110

Asian Sex Gazette  Korean Sex News