WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Japan
     May 14, 2010
Page 1 of 4
Fortress Guam resists US military buildup
By LisaLinda Natividad and Gwyn Kirk

United States presidents rarely visit the US territory of Guam (or Guahan in the Chamorro language), but President Barack Obama may visit in June 2010. This will be a significant stop for residents of this small island, 48 kilometers miles long and 13 kilometers wide, dubbed, "Where America's day begins".

Guam is the southern-most island in the Northern Mariana chain that also includes Rota, Tinian and Saipan. It is the homeland of indigenous Chamorro people whose ancestors first came to the islands nearly 4,000 years ago. Formed from two volcanoes, Guam's rocky core now constitutes an "unsinkable aircraft carrier" for the United States military in the words of Brigadier General

 

Douglas H Owens, a former commanding officer of Guam's Andersen air force base.

The reason given for Obama's unprecedented visit to the island was given in a White House conference call by Ben Rhodes, deputy national security advisor for strategic communications, as this:
While there he'll not only visit with commanders but also with local Guam authorities. And he's going to make sure that we have a very realistic and sustainable and well thought out approach to Guam. He has a vision which we refer to here as "one Guam, green Guam," which is apropos of many of the questions heretofore, designed to make sure that we're investing in capabilities on Guam that are sustainable over the course of time, that are clean energy focused, that do take very concrete steps to reduce the high price of energy on the island, and obviously will lead to an end state that's politically, operationally, and environmentally sustainable.

So the president, while there, will also take a hard look at the project and infrastructure needs on Guam. We'll obviously be looking at base-related construction that must take into accounts (sic) the needs of not only of an increased troop presence or Marine presence, but also the needs of the people of Guam, the impact on the environment, and the important role that the United States plays within the region ... I'd rather just make clear that we have a commitment to the people of Guam, and that as part of our ongoing plan for our presence in the region, are going to make very common-sense and important investments in the infrastructure there.
Barely mentioned in the shadows of these fine words with their emphasis on sustainability are the real reasons for Obama's visit: to rally community and official support for the Department of Defense plan to relocate 8,600 US Marines from Okinawa (Japan) to Guam, provide additional live-fire training sites, expand Andersen air force base, create berthing for a nuclear aircraft carrier, and erect a missile defense system on the island.

Despite their economic dependence on the US military, which occupies one-third of the island's landmass and dominates the island's economy, people in Guam have expressed strong opposition to the proposed enormous increase in the US military presence on economic, environmental, and cultural grounds. Due to Guam's status as an unincorporated US territory, however, local communities are highly constrained in their ability to influence the political process.

Indeed, they were not even consulted when the expansion plans were developed. Jon Blas of the coalition We Are Guahan stated, "We have not been able to say yes or no to this. Hawaii said no. California said no. But we were never given the opportunity." After more than a century of US control, the justification of military development for purposes of "national security" has been widely accepted by most island residents, many of who rely on the military for jobs given the lack of alternative employment.

However, following the release of the Department of Defense's (DoD's) Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) in November 2009, which for the first time revealed details of the proposed military build-up, community members started to question the enormous sacrifices they are being ordered to make in the name of "national security".

The situation is complicated by the fact that the United States proposal is contingent on the willingness of the recently elected Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) government to honor the previous administration's agreement to relocate an established US Marines base from a dense urban area in Okinawa to a new facility on a coastal site at Henoko in northern Okinawa.

The former Japanese government had agreed to contribute $6 billion towards construction of the Henoko base and the relocation of marines to Guam. The incoming coalition government was successful at the polls partly due to campaign commitments to review the US-Japan military alliance in general, and the base construction in particular. Some members criticized Japan's acquiescence toward US foreign policy; others resented the US "occupation mentality".

Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Obama made hasty visits to Tokyo last fall, invoking the importance of the alliance and pressing to keep the Okinawa-Guam accord intact. Indicative of the turn in opinion, some Japanese media bristled at this "bullying" and "high-handed treatment".

Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama announced that his government would make its decision on the Futenma relocation issue by December 2009, later deferring a response until May 2010. In a March 3 interview with the Asahi Shimbun, Richard P Lawless, former deputy under secretary of defense for Asia-Pacific affairs, who was involved in negotiating the agreement with Japan, expressed frustration that "the Japanese government seems intent on playing domestic politics and doesn't fully understand the magnitude of the issue".

Under steady US pressure, the Hatoyama government in early May abandoned its resistance to the Henoko plan. The question remains, however, whether it is prepared to impose its will on an Okinawan population which strongly opposes the new base. Meanwhile, Guam's congressional representative, Madeleine Bordallo, who fervently supported the military build-up as the primary way to boost Guam's weak economy, has moderated her position with a range of stipulations as a result of the outpouring of pubic testimony at town hall meetings, public hearings, community events, and in media reports. This article examines the issues of base expansion on Guam and assesses the movement against military expansion on Guam.

History of Guam
Archeological evidence indicates that Guam's indigenous Chamorro people first arrived in these islands around 2,000 BCE. Chamorros lived in coastal villages where they fished, farmed, and hunted to sustain themselves. They were skilled navigators who traded throughout Micronesia. The arrival of Ferdinand Magellan in the Marianas in 1521 marked the first contact with the Western world. In 1565, Spain sent an expedition to claim Guam for the Spanish Crown and in 1668 Father Diego Luis de San Vitores started a Catholic mission. This foreign influence, with attendant violence and epidemics of diseases, decimated the local population.

For 250 years, Spanish galleons plied between Asia, Europe and the Americas, carrying silks, spices, porcelain, cotton, and ivory from Manila to Acapulco, the viceroyalty of New Spain (Mexico). These goods were then transported overland to Vera Cruz and loaded onto ships for Spain. On the return journey, cargo included Mexican silver, Spanish administrators, missionaries, and provisions for the garrison in the Marianas. En route from Acapulco, the vessels replenished supplies of food and water on Rota and Guam.

Spain remained Guam's colonizer until the conclusion of the Spanish-American War. Under the terms of the 1898 Treaty of Paris, Cuba, Guam, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines were ceded to the United States. Spain sold the Northern Mariana Islands and the Caroline Islands to Germany, thus separating Guam politically and culturally from neighboring islands in the Marianas and throughout Micronesia. President William McKinley placed Guam under the jurisdiction of the Department of the Navy, which used the island as a refueling and communications station.

During this time, naval admirals served as governors and most administered the island as though they were running a ship. The naval administration also regulated land acquisition, the sale of liquor, marriages, taxation, agriculture, and schooling. An old military plan to put Chamorro people on reservations in the north and south of the island, leaving two-thirds of the land for military use, did not materialize. However, people's demand for citizenship was denied as an encroachment on military control.

On December 8, 1941, Japanese warplanes bombed US military installations on Guam, the same day as the attack on Pearl Harbor. Japanese forces took the island two days later and renamed it "Omiya Jima". For 31 months the people of Guam were subjected to hardship and atrocities inflicted by the Japanese Imperial Army; including forced labor to build runways, incarceration in concentration camps (such as Manenggon), executions, slaughter, forced prostitution, and rape. Chamorros resisted the Japanese invasion and, in allegiance to the US, assisted in hiding an American soldier, George Tweed, from Japanese forces for the entire occupation period. Recollections of World War II experiences evoke tears and trauma memories for most war survivors to this day.

Hailed as "liberation forces," US troops landed on Guam on July 21, 1944 after thirteen consecutive days of naval bombardment in which thousands lost their lives.

The bombing, followed by fierce combat, ravaged the island, and the main city of Hagatna was virtually destroyed. As soon as the US military secured Guam, they turned the island into a strategic forward base for the final push toward Japan. As was occurring in Okinawa at approximately the same time, thousands of acres were taken for the construction of naval and air force facilities and many Chamorros were dispossessed of their ancestral clan lands (such as the village of Sumay) and moved to neighboring locations designated by the US military.

Political and economic status
The Organic Act of Guam passed by the US Congress in 1950 made Guam an unincorporated territory of the United States with limited self-governing authority. The Organic Act placed Guam under the administrative control of the Department of the Interior. With a current population of approximately 173,456, Guam is one of 16 non-self-governing territories listed by the United Nations, and represented by one non-voting delegate in the US Congress. Residents are US citizens but not entitled to vote in presidential elections. Federal-territorial policies are decided in Washington, 7,938 miles (12,774 kilometers) away, placing a number of restrictions on the island and hampering the development of a viable civilian economy.

Prior to World War II, Guam was self-sufficient in agriculture, fishing, hunting, and husbandry. US Naval administrators encouraged food production for local and military needs. Nearly every family grew vegetables and produced meat; some specialized in fishing; and there was a viable copra - dried coconut - industry.

Following World War II, the military took a large portion of arable land to build bases and other installations, equivalent to nearly 50% of the island's landmass, including some of the most fertile land near popular fishing grounds. Since then, some lands have been returned following civic protest, with the US presently occupying nearly one-third of the island, part of which is not presently being used. Currently, nearly 90% of Guam's food is imported. 

Continued 1 2 3 4 


Japan base row causes regional ripples (Apr 29, '10)

Webb walks the line on redeployment
(Feb 19, '10)


1. US satellites shadow China's submarines

2. India steals a march on the high seas

3. The American Taliban are coming

4. Superpower dreams interrupted

5. Global sovereign debt crisis

6. Thai power grows from the gun barrel

7. Talk of a nuclear deal gains steam in Iran

8. Victory at all costs in Afghanistan

9. Ignore Keynes behind the arras

10. Indians fear Kasab could slip the noose

(24 hours to 11:59pm ET, May 12, 2010)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2010 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110