WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Oct 23, 2008
Page 3 of 5
US government throws oil on fire
By Henry C K Liu

"The short-term debt markets have been under considerable stress in recent weeks as money market mutual funds and other investors have had difficulty selling assets to satisfy redemption requests and meet portfolio rebalancing needs," the Fed said.

Under the Fed scheme, the US central bank will lend money to five special purpose vehicles, to be managed by JPMorgan Chase, tasked with purchasing assets from money market funds. These assets are low-risk paper, including certificates of deposit, bank notes and commercial paper with three-month maturities or less.

The creation of an extra liquidity facility on October 21 was seen as complementing a move the Fed announced two weeks earlier

 

to create a vehicle aimed at purchasing potentially unlimited amounts of three-month debt from banks and non-financial companies. The size of the Fed's balance sheet has nearly doubled.

Each of the five vehicles may purchase paper from 10 financial institutions. The overall size of the program is capped at $600 billion - with the Fed funding 90% and the funds, which sell assets, taking the first 10% of losses. The Fed announced its plan even as money markets showed signs of easing. Overnight dollar Libor (London Interbank Offered Rate) declined 23 basis points to 1.28%, below the Fed's target rate of 1.5%. Three-month dollar Libor eased to 3.83%, its lowest fix in nearly a month. Three-month Libor was fixing about 2.80% prior to upheavals and has yet to reflect the Fed's rate cut on October 8 of 50 basis points.

Strategy ignores asset overvaluation
Although each step by the government in reaction to the credit crisis was a logical, targeted response to new systemic financial upheavals, the result was to prop up select distressed firms deemed too big to fail and support failing markets as they occurred, hoping in vain that it would be the last move needed to resolve the systemic crisis to put the economy on a path of recovery. The Fed and the Treasury appeared to be rushing from emergency to emergency without a strategic plan to deal with the fundamental problem of a debt bubble collapse.

The disjointed interventions appeared designed to keep a collapsing debt bubble from collapsing, a hopeless task that even former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan, the bubble wizard par excellence, was not naive enough to try. Greenspan merely replaced a burst bubble with a new bigger bubble, never trying to stop a collapsing bubble in mid course. Greenspan's approach was that of a post-disaster cleanup crew, not rushing into a collapsing structure as the current bailout team appears to be trying to do. Throwing good money after bad merely makes good money into bad. Spending good money after the collapse would infinitely buy more in the cleanup task.

Added to the mix was the political problem of government credit allocation. In April, Chris Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, demanded that the Fed permit top-rated securities backed by student loans that now had uncertain market value and anemic liquidity to qualify for its $200 billion swap program. "If the Fed and the Treasury can commit $30 billion of taxpayer money to enable the takeover of Bear Stearns by JPMorgan Chase, then surely they can step in to enable working families to achieve the dream of a higher education for their children," the senator declared.

Two weeks later, the Fed said it would accept any AAA-rated securities as collateral, including those backed by student loans. The Fed has forced to move from its traditional role of neutral macro policy of stabilization to direct specific credit allocation, albeit in this particular case for a worthy cause, for where is the logic of saving the banking system to save tax payers' homes and not save the education of the nation's youths. As a matter of national policy, all education should be financed by public funds since education is the most rewarding social investment a society can make. Another is universal health care.

The economies of New York and New Jersey are also now severely impacted by the financial crisis on Wall Street. These states normally derive up to 30% of their revenue from the financial sector. The governors of the two states are calling for further stimulative aid from Washington. California is also saying it needs low-interest loans from the federal government to help with its budgetary shortfalls. The problem will spread to all states as the problems in financial sector spread to the economy.

The Fed floods Europe with dollars
On Monday, October 13, the Federal Reserve opened up the dollar spigot to European central banks to support the European dollar credit markets by agreeing to provide unlimited dollars, up from its previous $620 billion in currency swaps, to the three major central banks: the European Central Bank, the Bank of England and the Swiss National Bank, to allow them to relieve liquidity pressure on commercial banks across their respective regions.

Dollars had become elusive in recent weeks in the European banking system as short-term money markets around the world deteriorated. Domestic and foreign banks in Europe had been frozen out of loans beyond a day as institutions hoarded dollar resources amid concerns about counterparty default. Around the world, central banks were forced to move from the traditional role of monetary rule-makers to that of money and currency market players.

Meanwhile, to offer vastly more operational space to expand its liquidity facilities during the credit crisis, the Fed received authority from the Treasury in early October to start paying interest on reserves that commercial banks are required to deposit at the Fed.

Prompted by the US, governments across Europe took action to bail out their respective banks and protect their separate banking systems after the meeting of the Group of Seven leading industrialized countries in Washington during the weekend of October 11.

France extended state guarantees to $435 billion of senior bank debt to help jumpstart that country's credit markets. It created a state company with up to $54 billion in capital to recapitalize distressed French banks. The UK guaranteed $434 billion of bank debts and injected $64 billion into Royal Bank of Scotland Group, HBOS, a banking/insurance group in the UK, and Lloyds TSB Group, as part of its already announced ฃ400 billion (US$651 billion) bail-out plan.

Germany guaranteed up to $544 billion inter-bank debts, setting aside $27 billion for potential losses and injected up to $109 billion equity in German banks. Italy announced it will recapitalize Italian banks and guarantee bonds on a case-by-case basis. Spain will guarantee $136 billion in Spanish bank debts, set up a preventive facility to inject new capital into distressed Spanish banks until 2009 and establish up to $68 billion to buy Spanish bank assets.

The Netherlands is injecting 10 billion euros (US$13.4 billion) into ING Group, the banking and insurance giant which just weeks earlier was the white knight to bail out troubled Fortis. Austria, Portugal and Norway joined the effort, committing a total of 501 billion euros in guarantees and capital for banks in their respective jurisdiction.

Iceland banking crisis and geopolitics
Iceland's banking system meanwhile collapsed in September causing losses to non-Icelandic European depositors who were attracted by higher interest rates paid by Icelandic banks. The tiny country over the past decade had embraced neoliberal free-market capitalism and built a financial sector that brought unprecedented but unsustainable prosperity to its 300,000 people and won temporary favor with foreign savers and investors.

Iceland's financial crisis cannot be solved by bank nationalization, currency de-pegging and stock market suspension because its central bank, unlike the US Federal Reserve, which can produce dollars at will, must either earn or borrow euros and dollars. Failing to access International Monetary Fund loans because it is not yet part of the EU, Iceland turned to Russia for help. Commenting on the possibility of a 4 billion euro loan from Russia, Icelandic journalist Omar Valdimarsson ridiculed the value of 50 years of "special relationship" with the US by quoting Deng Xiaoping's famous saying: "It does not matter if the cat is black or white as long as it catches mice." The fat cat is Russia, although at the time of writing agreement with Moscow had yet to be reached.

Various reports, including in Business Week, on October 21 indicated Iceland "was likely" to receive a $6 billion rescue package "tailored by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), Nordic countries and Japan".

Crisis in East European banks
Banks in emerging economies in post-communist Eastern Europe, such as Hungary and Ukraine, were also hard hit. Ukraine, whose economy has been badly hurt from falling steel prices, may be unable to quickly accept a loan offered by the International Monetary Fund because the fund is seeking assurances on next year's budget from the cabinet, and the cabinet was recently dissolved by the president in a political shakeup.

While, with Iceland and Hungary, one of three European nations seeking aid from the IMF, Ukraine has complex political problems, being a country of 46 million culturally and politically divided between historical affinity towards Russia and new orientation towards the West.

Continued 1 2 3 4

 

 

 

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2008 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110