WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Apr 17, 2007
Page 3 of 3
Wolfowitz postings went to war backers
By Emad Mekay and Jim Lobe

speech writer for Bush, wrote in the National Review Online, a neo-conservative outlet, asking for understanding.

Frum suggested that Wolfowitz's self-styled and much questioned campaign against corruption was too important to end with his possible resignation over this scandal.

"Under the circumstances, it was Wolfowitz's duty to set the



most stringent example. But even if he erred, let's not lose sight of the larger issues - and the grosser scandal," Frum wrote, suggesting that the bank's global corruption fight was more noteworthy.

Another shot in the arm for Wolfowitz came from Fox News, another unerring cheerleader in the US media of the Iraq War that in the past gave much play to Wolfowitz arguments about the weapons of mass destruction that Saddam allegedly had.

"Documents give Wolfowitz a new lifeline in World Bank scandal of girlfriend's job," screamed the headline on the Fox News web site. The story went on to raise questions as to whether the controversy over the benefits in question that were awarded to Wolfowitz's girlfriend may have been the work of those unhappy with Wolfowitz's controversial anti-corruption campaign at the bank.

"Many of those most irked at Wolfowitz's tough stance were sitting on the board that is now judging his actions," Fox News said. It implied Wolfowitz's innocence, saying that he may have indeed taken "steps to try and determine if what he was doing was right - seemingly trying to navigate his way through an arcane bureaucracy with a maze of unusual rules and procedures".

Backing also came from another quarter with similar credentials: editors of The Wall Street Journal editorial page, known for their right-wing leanings. The newspaper suggested the scandal had no merit and was sheer power play.

"The dispute is so trivial that it betrays that this fracas has little to do with Mr Wolfowitz's ethics. The real fight here is over his attempt to make the bank and its borrowers more accountable for results, especially by exposing and punishing corruption," said the editorial.

Some support also came from the inside the bank. In a departure from their often reserved line, the World Bank's external affairs unit, now headed by a close Iraq War ally, Muasher, headlined a news story reporting on a press conference by the more often ignored African finance ministers on the bank's web site as such: "African ministers praise Paul Wolfowitz's support for the sub-continent."

The short piece on Saturday failed to report how African finance ministers in their conference have said they would respect the decision by the bank's board, which is looking into Wolfowitz's job at the helm of the Washington-based lender.

But despite this sudden rallying of support as the Wolfowitz camp regroups, the original questions remain unanswered: why Riza took a pay hike that is far more than the World Bank protocols state, and why the attempted coverup.

If World Bank staff rules had been respected, Riza was not to receive percentage increases greater than 12% and 3.7%, respectively as part of the settlement.

Yet payroll data obtained from the World Bank show that Riza, a communications officer, received a $47,300 and another 7.5% raise bringing her salary to $193,590, about $7,000 more than Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice earns. The board did not recommend that Wolfowitz award a salary increase of such dimensions to Riza.

And when asked about Riza's raises, a spokesman for Wolfowitz, Kevin Kellmes, told the Washington Post that that action was taken by the World Bank board of directors. The board still denies involvement and, to date, no evidence has surfaced to prove otherwise.

But most telling of all perhaps is that Wolfowitz himself admitted it. In his own words, Wolfowitz on Thursday told a room full of reporters in Washington: "I made a mistake, for which I am sorry."
(Inter Press Service)

 1 2 3 Back

 

 
 


 

All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110