WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    China Business
     Feb 6, 2007
US accuses China of 'illegal subsidies'
By Emad Mekay

WASHINGTON - The United States said on Friday it is taking China before the World Trade Organization (WTO) to complain about Beijing's use of "illegal subsidies", a move Beijing says is "a pity".

Quoting a spokesman for the Chinese Ministry of Commerce, the official Xinhua news agency this weekend said Beijing was considering the US position.

US Trade Representative Susan Schwab said talks with China



over the issue have failed and Washington has been left with no option but to request WTO consultations to eliminate those subsidies. "The case is important because we are seeking to level the playing field to allow US manufacturers to compete fairly with Chinese firms," Schwab said.

Washington alleges that China is fixing its tax laws and using other means to promote its own exports and to discriminate against imports of US manufactured goods.

The subsidy programs provide incentives for companies in China to purchase domestic equipment and accessories, instead of buying from US exporters, said the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR).

"This case is about standing up for America's workers and manufacturers," Schwab said. "China's subsidies can particularly distort trade conditions for small and medium-sized American enterprises [SMEs] and their workers."

Washington argues that a range of domestically produced goods in the United States, from steel to paper to computers, are denied an opportunity to compete in the Chinese market and in third-country markets where they are forced to vie with highly subsidized Chinese imports.

The alleged Chinese subsidies cover such sectors as steel, wood products and information technology, among others.

The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment on Friday.

A fact sheet distributed by the USTR office said that among the tactics China uses to give its companies an edge over US competitors are tariff exemptions, discounted lending rates and income-tax reductions and refunds available to China-based companies that meet certain export performance benchmarks.

These benefits have lured many firms, especially from neighboring Asian nations, which have moved their final assembly operations to China since its accession to the WTO.

The subsidies being challenged by Washington purportedly go to foreign companies that invest in China and that meet those criteria. US officials say those companies accounted for nearly 60% of China's export of manufactured goods in 2005.

The US itself has been widely criticized by developing countries for paying billions of dollars in agricultural subsidies to farmers, who have the effect of depressing local markets for farm products. In 2005, for example, a WTO dispute panel found that $3.2 billion in annual cotton subsidies and $1.6 billion in export credits paid by the US in cotton and other commodities were illegal under WTO rules.

Washington has nevertheless taken the offensive against China, albeit in a different sector - manufactured goods and services.

"China needs to be held fully accountable as a mature member of the international trading system - for the benefit of US companies and workers, the global trading system, and for its own sake," Schwab said in her remarks to the media.

The complaint comes only a day after a number of US lawmakers publicly lamented that the United States was not filing enough complaints about China before the WTO. The lawmakers said they were alarmed by the large, and growing, trade deficit between the two nations.

In 2005, China exported $243 billion worth of goods to the US - six times the amount that the US exported to China - leaving the US with a deficit of $202 billion in 2005, the largest deficit with any country.

In 2006, the US-China trade deficit is expected to exceed $230 billion.

"One reason for this glaring trade imbalance is China's continued non-compliance with its WTO obligations and our failure to challenge this non-compliance," Senator Carl Levin said before the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission hearing on relations between the two countries on Thursday.

The same day, the USTR and the Commerce Department presented the "2007 Subsidies Enforcement Report", which documents US efforts to monitor foreign government subsidy practices worldwide. The report said: "China has been unwilling to commit to the immediate withdrawal of the prohibited subsidies in question."

It also spoke of an explosive growth of China's steel production.

US business groups quickly sided with the USTR, and said they wanted to see more transparency in China's subsidies policies.

"China must play by the rules," said Myron Brilliant, vice president for Asia at the US Chamber of Commerce.

Since China was coaxed by Washington into joining the WTO, US exports to China have been growing robustly. US exports grew at an average annual rate of almost 23% in the past five years, and were on pace to grow 33% for 2006, but business leaders say they could do far better if the alleged Chinese subsidies were dealt with.

"This case expands the [US] administration's efforts to address China's distortions of trade, along with pressure to obtain greater Chinese actions to control product counterfeiting and copyright piracy, pushing for currency appreciation and acting in other areas where China needs to do more to live up to its WTO obligations," said National Association of Manufacturers president John Engler.
The United States has previously brought the only two disputes in the WTO against China, and the US and China settled a third dispute on the eve of a planned US WTO filing.

The first case was filed in March 2004; it involved value-added-tax rebates that discriminated against imported semiconductors. The two sides were able to resolve that dispute during the consultation phase.

Last March, Washington joined forces with Canada and the European Union to challenge Chinese rules that impose local-content requirements in the automotive sector.

(Inter Press Service)


Sino-American friction builds (Dec 20, '06)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110