WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Apr 14, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Checkbook journalism, Chinese-style
By Kent Ewing

them. Lan's case, which probably played a big role in prompting the latest GAPP edicts, has become a lightning rod in the debate over media reform in China.

The reporter was beaten to death by thugs on January 10 while investigating an unlicensed mine near Datong. Official media initially ignored the story, but it spread nevertheless. In the end, seven people were arrested for Lan's murder, and President Hu



Jintao himself ordered a further probe into the incident. But was Lan investigating an illegal mine, extorting money or both?

The China Trade News confirmed that Lan had been working for the newspaper for two months. But the mine owner, who allegedly ordered the beating, and Datong city officials said Lan did not carry a legally required press card. In addition, according to the state-run China Daily, the head of the Shanxi office of the China Trade News said Lan was not authorized as a reporter but had undertaken his investigation on his "personal initiative".

This horrible but ambiguous incident seemed to crystallize the ongoing debate over the sorry state of journalism in China. Who is real? Who is fake? What can be reported? What cannot?

In reporting the latest GAPP crackdown, state media have also cited the cases of four reporters working for other publications who were detained for extortion last May. According to Xinhua, the reporters - Wang Qiming, Meng Huaihu, Bu Jun and Chen Jinliang - demanded money from "institutions and companies, after they learned about their irregularities".

The four, who were employed by the China Food Quality Newspaper and three other newspapers, have been denounced by the State Administration of Press and Publications (SAPP) for bringing the country's journalists into disrepute and have had their press credentials revoked.

Their detention signals the SAPP's heightened seriousness toward journalistic fraud; ordinarily, the worst punishment a fake reporter can expect is the revocation of his or her press card, which was quite likely a forgery that can easily be replaced by another forgery.

A 100-day investigation in the Shanxi city of Luliang last year demonstrated the extent of the problem: the city's deputy director of press and publication, Yang Zhiming, unmasked 80 bogus hacks, and a lot of them carried press cards.

GAPP has promised stricter qualification requirements for journalists and has also vowed to revoke the licenses of media branches whose reporters engage in extortion and other illegal practices. That sounds good.

The problem, however, is that many of those media outlets are not licensed to begin with, and the culture of corruption is so widespread and systemic that no GAPP circular is going to do much about it. Beyond a few detentions here and the seizure of forged press cards there, China's brand of checkbook journalism should continue to thrive.

Indeed, the central government appears to have had much greater success snuffing out genuine investigative journalism than in combating its depraved counterpart. Just ask Chen Jieren, who last year lost his job as chief editor of the Beijing-based Public Interest Times after the paper was so bold as to run a story highlighting incorrect English translations on a newly launched government website.

Before that, Yang Bin, the progressive editor of the Beijing News, got the sack after his paper published reports of violent land disputes in Hebei province. And last August, Zan Aizong, who worked for another Beijing-based paper, the China Ocean News, was detained after posting reports on the Internet critical of a church demolition in the eastern city of Hangzhou.

Two other cases involving foreign publications received international attention. Zhao Yan, a researcher for the New York Times, and Ching Cheong, chief China correspondent for the Straits Times in Singapore, were both jailed in August on what are widely believed to be false charges.

Zhao was convicted of fraud and imprisoned for three years after contributing to a Times article, published in 2004, correctly predicting that former president Jiang Zemin would be replaced as head of the Central Military Commission by the current president, Hu Jintao. Ching, who was found guilty of spying for the Taiwanese government, was jailed for five years.

With an estimated 750,000 reporters in the country, journalism is flourishing in China; unfortunately, it's the wrong kind.

Kent Ewing is a teacher and writer at Hong Kong International School. He can be reached at kewing@hkis.edu.hk.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

 1 2 Back

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110