WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



     
     Sep 22, 2007
Page 2 of 2
Rocking the land of Poppins
By Chan Akya

to stay in business, and thus they choose to repay the banks, albeit with loans from other banks in most cases.

The growth in retail lending is hamstrung by poor legislation. It is a fairly lengthy process for banks in China and India to repossess homes of delinquent mortgage borrowers, for example. This difficulty in turn encourages slightly more risky behavior by some borrowers, although cultural factors such as the social stigma



attached to being bankrupt helps keep such risks on the lower side overall.

Additionally, there are not a lot of avenues for banks in China and India to sell their risks. The use of financial derivatives to diminish risk on the asset side of their balance sheets is quite low, even as the banks are themselves enthusiastic buyers of similar instruments originated in the US and Europe. I blame both the absence of securities regulations and the lack of investor education for this state of affairs. Granted that these are broadly the same category of financial derivatives that got US and European banks into trouble, their use is however justified by the sheer scale of risk being handled by banks in China and India relative to their capital bases.

Last comes the issue of supervision. Asian central bankers are in general less sophisticated than the dictates of modern financial systems. I rate the Reserve Bank of India ahead of the People's Bank of China in this respect, but that's like saying Josef Stalin was a better human being than Adolf Hitler. The central banks have a poor understanding of financial derivatives and their ability to distribute risk, as well as the benefits of rigorous risk analysis. Overall staffing levels are actually too low for their remit, and all too often officers are promoted for political rather than reasons of merit.

What to do
Rather than let all these issues simmer below the surface, Asian central banks must act immediately. I suggest the following measures to be adopted with great urgency by governments as well as central banks.

First, merge small and medium-sized banking entities into larger operations. Risks are often too localized when banks concentrate on specific regions. Examples of this can be found across the southern Chinese coast, where a number of banks quite literally only serve a single region and are therefore overexposed to certain industrial sectors. Merging these banks with those operating in different environments would be mutually beneficial.

Second, all public banks must be listed on the stock exchange, with foreigners allowed to own shares. While this is not in any way to suggest that foreigners are smarter than Asians at assessing risks, they do demand higher disclosures and transparency. Additionally, the insights of various dedicated fund managers specializing in bank stocks cannot but be good for the system as a whole - witness for example the improvements brought about in Japan by foreign-owned companies.

Third, securities legislation must incorporate new classes of financial derivatives and provide incentives for banks to sell down their risks (bank regulation). This would allow the development of proper bond markets across China and India that could help increase the flexibility of Chinese and Indian banks in terms of trimming their balance-sheet exposures to some assets while providing themselves with additional sources of liquidity.

Fourth, central banks must increase their supervision standards. In the case of Northern Rock, one of the key failures appears to be that the bank was maintaining low cash balances with the central bank to take advantage of the "averaging" of cash balances. Using averages is pretty dumb for banks - central banks must monitor variance and step in whenever balances fall, say, 20% below the required amount. This requires improved systems and better supervision.

Last, government-mandated limits on bank lending must be scrapped. These limits force banks in China and India to lend to specific sectors and regions because of the "priority" focus of the central government. That is a matter of fiscal rather than commercial intervention; therefore the direct responsibility for such loans must remain with the government rather than individual commercial banks.

Conclusion
China and India are well positioned now to undertake serious structural reforms. They should not wait for a crisis of the Northern Rock magnitude to force their hands, but rather act immediately. My suggestions above only represent a start for the sector. Forget air-conditioning the branches and providing free tea to the people visiting them; more urgent work beckons behind the scenes.

Notes
1. In gold we trust, Asia Times Online, September 8, 2007.
2. Asia and the vicious cycle of bank bailouts, ATol, August 11, 2007.
3. Chinese, Indian banks plunge at different rates, ATol, August 3, 2007.

(Copyright 2007 Asia Times Online Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)

1 2 Back

 

 

 

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2007 Asia Times Online (Holdings), Ltd.
Head Office: Unit B, 16/F, Li Dong Building, No. 9 Li Yuen Street East, Central, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110